Image Reconstruction and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Fracture Surfaces Based on the Stereo Matching Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

A computer program of the fractal analysis by the box-counting method was developed for the estimation of the fractal dimension of the three-dimensional fracture surface reconstructed by the stereo matching method. The image reconstruction and fractal analysis were then made on the fracture surfaces of materials created by different mechanisms. There was a correlation between the fractal dimension of the three-dimensional fracture surface and the fractal dimensions evaluated by other methods on ceramics and metals. The effects of microstructures on the fractal dimension were also experimentally discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Pages:

1593-1598

Citation:

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.B. Mandelbrot, “The Fractal Geometry of Nature”, translated by H. Hironaka, (Nikkei Science, Tokyo, 1985).

Google Scholar

[2] N. Almqvist, Surface Science, 355 (1996) p.221.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Komai and J. Kikuchi, J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Japan, 34 (1985) p.648.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Kobayashi and D.A. Shockey, Metall. Trans., 18A (1987) p. (1941).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Stampfl, S. Scherer, M. Berchthaler, M. Gruber and O. Kolednik, Int. J. Fracture, 78 (1996) p.35.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00018499

Google Scholar

[6] J. Stampfl and O. Kolednik, Int. J. Fracture, 101 (2000) p.321.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Kimura, M. Tanaka and R. Kato, submitted to Fractals: Y. Kimura and M. Tanaka, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Materials for Resources, Akita, Japan, October 11-13, 2001, Vol. 2, pp.249-253.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Takayasu, “Fractals in the Physical Sciences”, (Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, 1990).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Tanaka, J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Japan, 47 (1998) p.169.

Google Scholar

[10] R.H. Dauskardt, F. Haubensak and R.O. Ritchie, Acta Metall., 38 (1990) p.142.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Tanaka, J. Mater. Sci., 27 (1992) p.4717.

Google Scholar

[12] V.Y. Milman, N.A. Stelmashenko and R. Blumenfeld, Progress in Mater. Sci., 38 (1994) p.425. Fig. 9. The fractal dimension estimated by the variance method, Dv, and that estimated by the box-counting method, Db, in ceramics and metals.

Google Scholar

[2] 05 2. 10 2. 15 2. 20 2. 25.

Google Scholar

[2] 10.

Google Scholar

[2] 15.

Google Scholar

[2] 20.

Google Scholar

[2] 25.

Google Scholar

[2] 30.

Google Scholar

[2] 35.

Google Scholar

[2] 40 Db Dv Dv=Db L=360 pixels SiC (Norton NC-430) alumina mullite Cu-Be alloy (stage I) Cu-Be alloy (stage II) SUS316 steel (stage II) pure Zn (14. 7 MPa, 373 K) Impact-fractured surface Fatigue fracture surface Creep fracture surface L: size of analyzed area.

Google Scholar