An Analysis of the Characteristics of SPG Bridges Using NExT and ERA for Real-Time Monitoring

Abstract:

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 270-273)
• Pages: 2012-2017
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.270-273.2012
• Online since: August 2004
• Authors: Gwang Hee Heo, Giu Lee, Dong Gi Lee, Chin Ok Lee, Man Goo Kim
• Keywords: ERA, NExT, Real-Time Monitoring, SPG Bridge

References

[1] Doebling S. W., Farrar C.R., Prome, M.B. and Shevitz, D.W. (1996).

[2] Doebling S. W., Farrar C. R., Prime M. B. (1998), A Summary Review of Vibration-Based Damage Identification Methods, The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2), p.91~105.

DOI: 10.1177/058310249803000201

[3] James III G. H., Carne T. G., Lauffer J. P. (1993), The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for Modal Parameter Extraction from Operating Wind Turbines, Sandia Report, SAND92-1666. UC-261.

[4] Farrar C. R., et al. (1994), Dynamic Characterization and Damage Detection in the I-40 Bridge over the Rio Grande, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-12767-MS.

[5] Juang J. N., Pappa R. S. (1985), An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for Modal Parameter Identification and Model Reduction, J. Guidance, vol 8, No. 3, p.620~627.

DOI: 10.2514/3.20031

[6] Pappa R. S., Juang J. N. (1988), Some Experiences with the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm, Journal of Sound and Vibration, p.30~34.

[7] MATLAB (1997), The Math Works, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.

[8] Heo, Gwanghee, Lee, giu and Shin, Heung Chul, Smart Monitoring System for Large Structures Using Natural Excitation Techniques, Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers(KSCE), Korea, November 2003, submitted. Table 2. MAC values Experimental results Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 0. 99 0. 17 0. 01 0. 00 0. 05 0. 07 2 0. 17 0. 88 0. 02 0. 02 0. 00 0. 06 3 0. 00 0. 01 0. 93 0. 03 0. 02 0. 00 4 0. 09 0. 00 0. 14 0. 91 0. 01 0. 16 5 0. 03 0. 10 0. 03 0. 10 0. 78 0. 04 Anal. 6 0. 02 0. 03 0. 06 0. 33 0. 11 0. 70.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1631030