Automated Fatigue Life Assessment for Welded Cruciform Joint Considering Welding Residual Stress

Article Preview

Abstract:

For a rational design of a welded joint, it is necessary to repeatedly assess the fatigue life of the joint with various dimensions and welding conditions. In this paper, an automated, repeatable/repetitive fatigue life assessment process for a welded cruciform joint was studied. The process consists of a structural analysis to obtain the stress distribution in the vicinity of the weldtoe, a thermal elasto-plastic analysis to determine the welding residual stress, and a fatigue life assessment based on the analyzed stress distribution and welding residual stress. With changes in design conditions including dimensions and/or welding heat input, the aforementioned tasks have to be performed. Using a commercial tool for system integration, automation of a repeated process for a welded cruciform joint based on 2D modeling was achieved. In this automated system, data exchanges between programs, regardless of whether they are commercial or in-house, work well, and parametric studies for optimal design can be performed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 297-300)

Pages:

2800-2805

Citation:

Online since:

November 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3, Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, CEN ENV*1993-1-1 (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Han, T. Lee and B. Shin: A Quantitative Estimation of Welding Residual Stress Relaxation for Fatigue Strength Analysis, Transactions of the KSME, A Vol. 26 No. 10, (2002), p.2018- (2025).

Google Scholar

[3] T. Lee, Y. Nam, S. Han and B. Shin: A New Model for the Fatigue Life Prediction Considering Residual Stress Relaxation, Proc. Of the Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf., Japan (2002), p.214219.

Google Scholar

[4] ANSYS Inc., Release 7. 1 (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Phoenix Integration Inc., ModelCenter Ver. 4. 0 (2001).

Google Scholar