Alumina Powder Containing δ, γ Crystal Phases: Evaluation of Osteoconductivity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Alumina powder containing δ , δ crystal phases (designated δAP) showed osteoconductivity. δAP was manufactured by fusing pulverized alumina powder and quenching it. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate osteoconductivity of δAP using rat tibiae. Alumina powder containing αcrystal phase (designated αAP) was used as a reference material. These two types of alumina powder were packed into the intramedullary canals of rat tibiae to evaluate osteoconductivity, as determined by an affinity index. Rats were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. The affinity index, equal to the length of bone in direct contact with the powder surface expressed as a percentage of the total length of the powder surface, was calculated for each alumina powder at each interval. At 4 and 8 weeks, the affinity indices for δAP were significantly higher than those for αAP. For both δAP and αAP, there were no significant differences between the values for 4 and 8 weeks. This study revealed that the osteoconductivity of δAP was due to the alumina’s δcrystal phases. δAP shows promise as a basis for developing a osteoconductive biomaterial.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 309-311)

Pages:

789-792

Citation:

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Nakamura T, Kato H, Okada Y, Shinzato S, Kawanabe K, Tamura J, Kokubo T. Bioceramics Vol 13. Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2000. pp.661-664.

Google Scholar

[2] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y. Bioceramics Vol 13. Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2000. pp.665-668.

Google Scholar

[3] Shinzato S, Kobayashi M, Mousa WF, Kamimura M, Neo M, Kitamura Y, Kokubo T, Nakamura T: J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 258-272.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200008)51:2<258::aid-jbm15>3.0.co;2-s

Google Scholar

[4] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54: 491-500.

Google Scholar

[5] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 55: 277-284.

Google Scholar

[6] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 56: 452-458.

Google Scholar

[7] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Tamura J, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 56: 571-577.

Google Scholar

[8] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 59: 225-232.

Google Scholar

[9] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Ando K, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 60: 556-563.

Google Scholar

[10] Kamimura M, Tamura J, Shinzato S, Kawanabe K, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T: J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 61: 564-571.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10214

Google Scholar

[11] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kawanabe K, Kokubo T: J Biomed Mater Res 2003; 65B: 262-271.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10008

Google Scholar

[12] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kawanabe K, Kokubo T: J Biomed Mater Res 2004. 2. 15; 68B: 132-139.

Google Scholar

[13] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Goto K, Kokubo T: Bioceramics Vol. 17 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Switzerland 2005. pp.133-136.

Google Scholar

[14] Nakamura T, Yamamuro Y, Higashi S, Kokubo T, Ito S: J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 685-698.

Google Scholar

[15] Kokubo T, Ito S, Shigematsu M, Sakka S, Yamamuro T: J Mater Sci 1985; 20: 2001-(2004).

Google Scholar

[16] Shinzato S, Kobayashi M, Choju K, Kokubo T, Nakamura T: J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 46: 287-300.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199908)46:2<287::aid-jbm19>3.0.co;2-i

Google Scholar

[17] Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y: J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 60: 585-591.

Google Scholar