Comparison of Mammalian Cell Suspension Culture Methods Using Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanospheres and Dextran Microcarriers

Ju Hee Ryu; Byoung Soo Kim

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.342-343.113

Paper Titles

Effect of Three-Dimensional Scaffold Geometry on Chondrocyte Adhesion
p.97

Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cell Seeded Hyaluronic Acid-Collagen Scaffolds for Adipogenesis Investigated In Vivo
p.101

Ectopic Osteoinduction by Variously Demineralized Allogenic Cortical Bone Matrix
p.105

Characterization of PCL/HA Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
p.109

Comparison of Mammalian Cell Suspension Culture Methods Using Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanospheres and Dextran Microcarriers
p.113

Bone Response to Cyclic Loading with Anodized Implants
p.117

Effects of Vitamin K₂ on Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation in Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Umbilical Cord Blood
p.121

A Developmental Study of Artificial Skin Using the Alginate Dermal Substrate
p.125

A Mineralization Study of Various Human Dental Stem Cells
p.129

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 342-343Comparison of Mammalian Cell Suspension Culture...

Comparison of Mammalian Cell Suspension Culture Methods Using Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanospheres and Dextran Microcarriers

Abstract:

Previously, we have developed a novel method for suspension culture of anchoragedependent animal cells using biodegradable polymer nanospheres. In this study, we compared the polymer nanosphere culture method to dextran microcarrier culture method, which is a conventional suspension culture method. Most of human dermal fibroblasts (91 ± 5 %) cultured with polymer nanospheres formed aggregates on day 2. Most of cells (92 ± 7 %) attached onto microcarriers by 4 h. Microcarrier culture method had a lower apoptotic activity (3.4 folds on day 4), compared to the nanosphere culture. The microcarrier culture method had a higher cell growth (2.4-fold versus 1.7- fold growth on day 4) than the nanosphere culture. Although the polymer nanosphere culture method did not yield better outcomes than the microcarrier culture, the polymer nanosphere culture method may offer advantages over the microcarrier culture method with respect to cell protection from the shear stress during agitation at high speed and cell transplantation without enzyme digestion process to harvest cultured cells.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 342-343)

Pages:

113-116

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.342-343.113

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2007

Authors:

Ju Hee Ryu, Byoung Soo Kim

Keywords:

Microcarriers, Nanospheres, Poly(lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid), Suspension Culture

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] M.S. Croughan, J.F. Hamel and D.I.C. Wang: Biotechnol. Bioeng. Vol. 29 (1987), p.130.

Google Scholar

[2] J.H. Ryu, D.J. Oh, C.Y. Choi and B.S. Kim: Biotechnol. Lett. Vol. 25(2003), p.1363.

Google Scholar

[3] J.H. Ryu, S.S. Kim, S.W. Cho, C.Y. Choi and B.S. Kim: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 71A (2004), p.128.

Google Scholar

[4] J.H. Ryu, M.S. Kim, G.M. Lee, C.Y. Choi and B.S. Kim: Biomaterials Vol. 26 (2005), p.2173.

Google Scholar

[5] S.I. Han, B.S. Kim, S.W. Kang, H. Shirai and S.S. Im: Biomaterials Vol. 24 (2003), pp.3453-14 Time (days) Cells (105/ml) microcarrier No nanosphere nanosphere.

Google Scholar