Engineering a Next Generation Water-Based Grinding Fluid

Peter Hug; Andrew R. Nelson; Stuart C. Salmon

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.389-390.308

Paper Titles

Effects of Grain Size and Concentration of Grinding Wheel in Ultrasonically Assisted Grinding
p.283

Electrochemical Finishing with an Electrode Vibrated with Biaxial Ultrasonic Transducer
p.289

Synchronous Finish Processes Using Grinding and Ultrasonic Electrochemical Finishing on Hole-Wall Surface
p.295

Development of a Three-Dimensional Tool Oscillation System for Finishing Metal Molds
p.302

Engineering a Next Generation Water-Based Grinding Fluid
p.308

Evaluation of Bearing Grinding Fluids
p.314

The Correlation and Spectrum Research on Cylindrical Surface Lapping Machined with Abrasive Jet Finishing Restricted by Grinding Wheel
p.320

Application of a Floating Nozzle to Grinding Process Using an Edge of Grinding Wheel
p.326

A Study on Airflow Field of Super-High Speed Pectination Grinding Wheel Based on PIV
p.332

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 389-390Engineering a Next Generation Water-Based Grinding...

Engineering a Next Generation Water-Based Grinding Fluid

Abstract:

There are few water-based fluids, on the market, designed specifically for grinding and abrasive machining processes. Fluid manufacturers, caught up in serving the “non-cutting” functions, have neglected the prime reasons for using a grinding fluid. This paper begins to assess water-based fluid chemistries and observe the cause and effect relationship with respect to grinding power and wheel life. The end result will be not only be a next generation grinding fluid, but also a better understanding of the role of the grinding fluid in a grinding or abrasive machining operation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 389-390)

Pages:

308-313

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.389-390.308

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2008

Authors:

Peter Hug, Andrew R. Nelson, Stuart C. Salmon

Keywords:

Active Sulphur, Detergency, Effect of Fluid Concentration, G Ratio, Grinding Power, Surface Tension, Surfactant, Water-Based Grinding Fluid

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] S.C. Salmon: Abrasive Lesson Part 2. (Cutting Tool Engineering. Vol. 53, No. 4, 2001).

Google Scholar

[2] United States Environmental Protection Agency: Pollution Prevention Guide To Using Metal Removal Fluids In Machining Operations. 2002. www. TechSolve. org.

Google Scholar

[3] E.J. Duwell, I.S. Hong and W.J. McDonald: The Effect of Oxygen and Water on the Dynamics of Chip Formation During Grinding. No. 68LC-19. American Society of Lubrication Engineers. Conference, Atlantic City, NJ, USA. October 8-10, (1968).

Google Scholar

[4] M.F. Frost and P.M.T. Fursdon: Towards Optimum Centreless Grinding. PED Vol 16. Milton C. Shaw Symposium. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Conference Miami, FL, USA. November 17-22, (1985).

Google Scholar

[5] Nelson, A. R: Grinding Test Data: Reciprocating. Master Chemical Corporation, Perrysburg, OH, USA. www. masterchemical. com.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Hug: Rapid Enumeration and Viability Determination of Mycobacteria in Metalworking Fluids. Society for Tribology and Lubrication Engineering Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA. May (2005).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Lawrence, S. Luedeking and J. Fredrickson: BrainMaker, Neural Networks and Expert Systems. California Scientific Software, Nevada City, Ca, USA.

Google Scholar