Fatigue Damage Evaluation and Retrofit of Steel Orthotropic Bridge Decks

Article Preview

Abstract:

Since the first application of steel orthotropic deck in bridges, engineers have shown great interest in the popularization of steel decks, based on their various advantages like light-weight, high capacity and so on. However, because of their complex configurations, repeated loading, and stress concentration, many details of steel orthotropic bridge decks are fatigue-sensitive. Recently, considerable increase in traffic volume and wheel loads has caused a number of fatigue cracks in steel orthotropic bridge decks in China. For example, bridge engineers have detected thousands of fatigue cracks in steel orthotropic deck on the main box girder of Humen Bridge only ten years after opening to traffic, which is the first modern suspension bridge with the main span of 888 meters in China. So the bridge owners pay more attention to evaluate the locations of fatigue damages. In current paper, the standard section of the real bridge deck was simulated and a kind of typical fatigue cracks was selected to analyze their fatigue life using S-N curve, the fatigue damage analysis was carried out on the longitudinal ribs to deck plate connections. The fatigue damage analysis results were consistent with the observations from real bridge decks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 413-414)

Pages:

741-748

Citation:

Online since:

June 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] China Bridge Drafting Group: China Bridge (People Traffic Press, Beijing 2003).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Wolchuk: ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering Vol. 116 (1992), p.75.

Google Scholar

[3] British Standards Institution: Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges, BS5400, Part 10 (BSI, London1980).

Google Scholar

[4] S.J. Maddox: The Fatigue Behavior of Trapezoidal Stiffener to Deck Plate Welds in Orthotropic Bridge Decks, Transport and Road Research Laboratory Supplementary Report 96: Crowthorne, UK (1974).

Google Scholar

[5] Japan Society of Road: Fatigue Design Recommendations for Steel Road Bridge (JSR, Tokyo2002).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Kondo, K. Yamada, et al, in: Fatigue of Steel and Concrete Structures, volume 37 of IABSE Reports, edited by International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Lausanne, Switzerland (1982).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Bruls, in: Remaining Fatigue Life of Steel Structures, volume 59 of IABSE Reports, edited by International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Lausanne, Switzerland (1990).

Google Scholar

[8] C. Beales: Assessment of Trough to Crossbeam Connections of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks, Transport and Road Research Laboratory Research Report 276: Crowthorne, UK (1990).

Google Scholar

[9] J.R. Cuninghame: Fatigue Classification of Welded Joints in Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks, Transport and Road Research Laboratory Research Report 259: Crowthorne, UK (1990).

Google Scholar

[10] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO, Washington 2005).

Google Scholar

[11] European Committee for Standardization: Eurocode3: Design of Steel Structures, Part2: Steel Bridges, ENV1993-2 (European Committee for Standardization, Brussels 2004).

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. 17u. com/destination/s_detail_11021_13. html.

Google Scholar

[13] C.S. Wang: Assessment of Remaining Fatigue Life and Service Safety for Riveted Steel Bridges (Tongji University Press, Shanghai 2007).

Google Scholar