Effects of Molecular Weight and Annealing on Electrical Conductivity of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Composites of polypropylene (PP) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were prepared by a micro melt mixing process. The molecular weight of PP was varied from 190,000 to 340,000 to examine its effects on the electrical conductivity. It has been discovered that a significant enhancement of electrical conductivity could be achieved by a thermal post annealing process above the melting temperature of PP. Factors such as annealing time, temperature, viscosity of PP, and content of MWCNTs all affected the enhancement of electrical conductivity. Re-aggregation of MWCNTs and the subsequent formation of MWCNT networks during annealing are considered to be the main reasons for the quick enhancement of electrical conductivity. The observed effect of molecular weight of PP on the enhancement of electrical conductivity suggested that the enhancement process could be controlled by diffusion of MWCNTs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 447-448)

Pages:

619-623

Citation:

Online since:

September 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.H. Al-Saleh and U. Sundararaj: Carbon Vol. 47 (2009), p.2.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Grossiord, J. Loos, O. Regev C.E. Koning: Chem Mater. Vol. 18 (2006), p.1089.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Goldel, G. Kasaliwal and P. Potschke: Macromol. Rapid. Commun. Vol. 30 (2009), p.423.

Google Scholar

[4] A.I. Isayev, R. Kumar and T.M. Lewis: Polymer Vol. 50 (2009), p.250.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.J. Li and H. Shimizu: Macromolecules Vol. 42 (2009), p.2587.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Andrews, D. Jacques, M. Minot and T. Rantell: Macromol. Mater. Eng. Vol. 287 (2002), p.395.

Google Scholar

[7] G.X. Chen, Y.J. Li and H. Shimizu: Carbon Vol. 45 (2007), p.2334.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Li and H. Shimizu: Polymer Vol. 48 (2007), p.2203.

Google Scholar

[9] S.B. Kharchenko, J.F. Douglas, J. Obrzut, E.A. Grulke and K.B. Migler: Nat. Mater. Vol. 3 (2004), p.564.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Grossiord, P.J.J. Kivit, J. Loos, J. Meuldijk, A.V. Kyrylyuk and P. van der Schoot: Polymer Vol. 49 (2008), p.2866.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.033

Google Scholar

[11] B. Krause, P. Potschke and L. Haussler: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 69 (2009), p.1505.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Villmow, P. Potschke, S. Pegel, L. Haussler, and B. Kretzschmar: Polymer Vol. 49(2008), p.3500.

Google Scholar

[13] X. X. Sun and M. Song: Macromol. Theory Simul. Vol. 19 (2010), p.57.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Gorrasi, V. Romeo, B. De Vivo, and V. Tucci: Nanotechnology Vol. 18 (2007), p.275703.

Google Scholar