Short Term Creep Small Punch Testing of P91 and P92 Steels, Observations and Correlations with the Numerical Results

Petr Dymáček

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.465.179

Paper Titles

Fatigue Fracture Model for Weak Fiber/Matrix Interface Composite within Three Point Bending Test
p.161

Wear of Cutting Tools Used in Milling Treatments
p.165

Tearing and Delaminating of a Polymer Laminate
p.169

The Effect of Polymer Pipe Weld Geometry on Creep Lifetime
p.175

Short Term Creep Small Punch Testing of P91 and P92 Steels, Observations and Correlations with the Numerical Results
p.179

The [100] Compressive Strength of Perfect Cubic Crystals under Superimposed Biaxial Stresses
p.183

Fatigue Crack Growth Rate under Different Bending to Torsion Ratios in 10HNAP Steel
p.187

Experimental Evaluation of Material Rollability in Profile Rolling
p.191

Stability of Ultrafine-Grained Microstructure in Fcc Metals Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation
p.195

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 465Short Term Creep Small Punch Testing of P91 and...

Short Term Creep Small Punch Testing of P91 and P92 Steels, Observations and Correlations with the Numerical Results

Abstract:

The contribution is presenting experimental results of conventional creep and small punch testing performed on miniaturized discs prepared from P91 and P92 steels. Some of the test cases were also numerically modeled by Finite Element Method (FEM) with help of Norton's constitutive model and the results were compared with the experiment. Presented work complements the existing empirical investigations on small punch and conventional creep tests relations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials Structure & Micromechanics of Fracture VI

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 465)

Pages:

179-182

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.465.179

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2011

Authors:

Petr Dymáček

Keywords:

Chromium Steel, Creep, Finite Element Model (FEM), Small Punch Test

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] C. Sainte Catherine, J. Messier, Ch. Poussard, S. Rosinski, J. Foulds: In: Small Specimen Test Techniques: Fourth Volume. Edited by M. A. Sokolov, J. D. Landes, G. E. Lucas. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002, p.350.

DOI: 10.1520/stp10832s

Google Scholar

[2] P. Dymáček: In: New methods of damage and failure analysis of structural parts, TU Ostrava, Czech Republic, September 4-8, 2006, ISBN 80-248-1126-0, p.269.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Abendroth, M. Kuna: Eng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 73 (2006), pp.710-725.

Google Scholar

[4] R. W. Ewans, M. Ewans: Materials Science and Technology, vol. 22, no 10. 2006, pp.1155-1162.

Google Scholar

[5] X. Ling, Y. Zheng, Y. You, Y. Chen: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 84 (2007), pp.304-309.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Dymáček, K. Milička: Strength of Materials, no. 1 (391) - 2008, pp.32-35.

Google Scholar

[7] F. Dobeš, K. Milička, B. Ule, T. Šustar, V. Bicego, S. Tettamanti, R.H. Kozlowski, J. Klaput, M.P. Whelan, K. Maile, C. Schwarzkopf: Engineering Mechanics, 5, 3, pp.157-160 (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(99)00039-4

Google Scholar

[8] K. Milička, F. Dobeš: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 83 (2006), pp.625-634.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.009

Google Scholar

[9] P. Dymáček, K. Milička: Materials Science and Engineering A-Structural materials. no. 510-511 (2009), pp.444-449.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.06.053

Google Scholar