A New Computer Simulation of Neck Injury Biomechanics

Article Preview

Abstract:

Head and neck injuries are the most frequent severe injury resulting from traffic accidents. Neck injury mechanisms are difficult to study experimentally due to the variety of impact conditions involved, as well as ethical issues, such as the use of human cadavers and animals. Finite element analysis is a comprehensive computer aided mathematical method through which human head and neck impact tolerance can be investigated. Detailed cervical spine models are necessary to better understand cervical spine response to loading, improve our understanding of injury mechanisms, and specifically for predicting occupant response and injury in auto crash scenarios. The focus of this study was to develop a C1–C2 finite element model with optimized mechanical parameter. The most advanced material data available were then incorporated using appropriate nonlinear constitutive models to provide accurate predictions of response at physiological levels of loading. This optimization method was the first utilized in biomechanics understanding, the C1–C2 model forms the basis for the development of a full cervical spine model. Future studies will focus on tissue-level injury prediction and dynamic response.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 467-469)

Pages:

339-344

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Matrix Analysis Of Framed Structures, 3rd Edition by Jr. William Weaver, James M. Gere, 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag New York, LLC, ISBN-13: 9780412078613, First edition (1966).

Google Scholar

[2] Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, Taddei F, Brynjolfsson S, Viceconti M. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clinical Biomechanics 2008; 23(2): 135–46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024

Google Scholar

[3] Ogden, R., 1984, Nonlinear Elastic Deformations, Ellis Harwood Ltd., Chichester, England.

Google Scholar

[4] Christensen, P. 1847 of the LS-DYNA 971 Keyword User's manual.

Google Scholar

[5] Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. 2000, A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm-NSGA-II, KanGAL Report Number 2000001.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83

Google Scholar

[6] Jebaseelan DD, Jebaraj C, Rajasekaran S. Finite element modeling of thoracolumbar spine for investigation of TB in spine. In: 13th International conference in biomedical engineering. 2008. p.2088–91.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_520

Google Scholar

[7] Meyer, F., Bourdent, N., Deck, C., Willinger, R., and Raul, J.S. (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] Chancey, V.C., Nightingale, R.W., Ee, C.A.V., Knaub, K.E., and Myers, B.S. (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] Ha SK. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3–C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. Medical Engineering and Physics 2006; 28(6): 534–41.

DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.09.006

Google Scholar

[10] Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, Wolfla CE, Shender BS, Paskoff G. Level dependent coronal and axial moment–rotation corridors of degeneration-free cervical spines in lateral flexion. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Figure 8. The Neck whilpash injury Finite Element Modeling Processing.

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.00200

Google Scholar