Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Using the Instrumentation of an Existing Building

Abstract:

France is a country composed of moderate seismic hazard regions but however vulnerable to earthquakes. Indeed, only a few parts of existing buildings have been built using paraseismic regulation. Several current large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment methods are used, as Hazus or Risk-UE, but they are inappropriate to the analysis of a specific building. In our case, we use an experimental approach to study the elastic behaviour of existing buildings: ambient vibration analyses seem to be an interesting way to determine the vulnerability. Ambient noise testing with Output-Only Modal Identification is a low-cost non-destructive method to provide vibration data from civil engineering structures like buildings. The interest of this method is to obtain dynamic parameters with only natural excitations: wind, traffic, human activity... In the frame of the “Plan séisme des Hautes-Pyrénées”, the building considered is the relatively regular 18-storey Ophite Tower located in Lourdes, France. The vibration measurements are conducted using a 24-channel system connected to an acquisition station. The modal parameters of this building (natural frequencies, modal shapes and damping) are calculated using the stochastic subspace identification method. These parameters, extracted from in situ data, are then used to calibrate a model. Having defined damage level criterion, the response motion, produced by seismic events, will lead to the determination of the vulnerability curves of Ophite Tower.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 482)
• Pages: 79-87
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.482.79
• Online since: June 2011
• Authors: Fabien Duco, Jean Pierre Faye, Serge Caperaa, Eric Reubrez
• Keywords: Existing Building, Instrumentation, Modeling, Ophite Tower, Seismic Vulnerability

References

[1] FEMA, HAZUS Earthquake loss estimation methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., (1999).

[2] Risk-UE, An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns, WP4: Vulnerability of current buildings, European Project, (2003).

DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3608-6_23

[3] B. Peeters, System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, (2000).

[4] P. Gueguen, M. Langlais, S. Hatton, F. Grimaud, Instrumentation du bâtiment Ophite, Lourdes, France, (2008).

[5] R. Brincker, L. Zhang, P. Andersen, Modal identification of output only systems using Frequency Domain Decomposition, Smart Materials and Structures, (2001).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303

[6] W. Heylen, S. Lammens and P. Sas, Modal Analysis Theory and Testing, KUL, Leuven, Belgium, (1994).

[7] I. Goethals and B. De Moor, Model reduction and energy analysis as a tool to detect spurious modes, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA), Leuven, Belgium, (2002).

[8] C. Michel, Vulnérabilité sismique de l'échelle du bâtiment à celle de la ville - Application à Grenoble, Thèse de Doctorat de l'Université J. Fourier, Grenoble, France, (2007).

DOI: 10.4000/tourisme.1833

[9] F. Dunand, Pertinence du bruit de fond sismique pour la caractérisation dynamique et l'aide au diagnostic sismique, UJF Grenoble, France, (2005).