Crystallographic Analysis of Specimens Used for Calibrate a Failure Model for an Al 6061 – T6 Alloy

Marco Giglio; Andrea Manes; Carlo Mapelli; Davide Mombelli; Claudio Baldizzone; Andrea Gruttadauria

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.488-489.89

Paper Titles

Modeling Ductile Fracture Using the Discontinuous Velocity Domain Splitting Method
p.69

Notched Specimens Fracture Prediction with an Advanced GTN Model
p.77

Dynamic Characteristics of Composite Materials Body for Bi-Modal Tram
p.81

Comparison between 3D FEM and Standard ISO Tooth Root Stresses
p.85

Crystallographic Analysis of Specimens Used for Calibrate a Failure Model for an Al 6061 – T6 Alloy
p.89

Cyclic Mixed-Mode Crack Propagation due to Time-Dependent Multiaxial Loading in Jet Engines
p.93

Crack Growth Rates and Corrosion Fatigue of Austenitic Stainless Steels in High Chloride Solutions
p.97

Rolling Contact Fatigue Crack Growth Prediction by the Asperity Point Load Mechanism
p.101

Mechanical Characterization of Friction Stir Channels under Internal Pressure and In-Plane Bending
p.105

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 488-489Crystallographic Analysis of Specimens Used for...

Crystallographic Analysis of Specimens Used for Calibrate a Failure Model for an Al 6061 – T6 Alloy

Abstract:

Calibration and exploitation of failure criterion is at present a challenging field in the structural integrity scenario. Calibrated failure criteria allow the simulation/reproduction of damages using virtual approach and eventually further assessment of the residual integrity of the components. Therefore the increase of awareness in failure issues makes the numerical simulation an actual, useful and reliable tool for the analysis of complex structures under extreme loads, especially in aerospace field where full scale tests are often very expensive and difficult to carry out. With this aim, the constitutive relations of an Aluminium Al 6061-T6 alloy have been calibrated with dedicated focus on failure criterion. The results obtained have been discussed considering the crystallographic measurements that permit to point out the dissipative behavior on the basis of texture formation as a function of the load type. The final aim is to confirm and explain the different failure behavior depending on the different stress triaxiality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics X

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

89-92

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.488-489.89

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Marco Giglio, Andrea Manes, Carlo Mapelli, Davide Mombelli, Claudio Baldizzone, Andrea Gruttadauria

Keywords:

Al 6061-T6, Bao-Wierzbicki Method, EBSD Analysis, Failure, Texture

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] A. Gilioli, A. Manes, M. Giglio, Calibration of a constitutive material model for AL-6061-T6 aluminum alloy, Proceeding of the ACE X, July 8-9, 2010, Paris, (France).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Bao, T. Wierzbicki. A comparative study on various ductile crack formation criteria. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 126(3): 314–324, (2004).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1755244

Google Scholar

[3] D. R. Lesuer, G. J Kay, M. M. LeBlanc. Modeling large-strain, high rate deformation in metals, UCRL-JC-134118, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] AA. VV. ASM Metal Handbook, Vol. 9, Metallography and Microstructure, pagg. 694, 712, 1688 (2004).

Google Scholar