Performance Bound of Position Estimation in Image Matching

Article Preview

Abstract:

Position estimation in image matching is a fundamental step in computer vision and image processing. To deal with the problem of performance prediction, we formulate it under statistical parameter estimation aspect. The lower bound of position estimation variance is obtained based on Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) theory. This paper analyses the impact of noise to 1-D signal matching, derives the lower bound of variance, and then extends it to 2-D image matching. Furthermore, we derive numerical expression that can be computed from observed data. Finally, we use Monte Carlo simulation method to verify the derived analytical expressions. Experimental results show that the derived CRLB is tight to simulation estimated variance. The CRLB can characterize the performance bound of position estimation in image matching.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

766-772

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Bhanu and I. Pavidis, Computer Vision Beyond the Visible Spectrum, Springer-Verlag, London, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Prentice-Hall, Inc., (1993).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Dixon and A. Lanterman, Information-Theoretic Bounds on Target Recognition Performance from Laser Radar Data, Automatic Target Recognition XVI, SPIE Vol. 6234, Ed: F.A. Sadjadi, April 2006, p.394–403.

DOI: 10.1117/12.674811

Google Scholar

[4] D. Robinson and P. Milanfar, Fundamental performance limits in image registration, IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 13, no. 9, Sep. 2004, p.1185–1199.

DOI: 10.1109/tip.2004.832923

Google Scholar

[5] M. Dudzik, Electro-Optical Systems Design, Analysis, and Testing, The Infrared & Electro-Optical Systems Handbook, SPIE PRESS, (1993).

DOI: 10.1117/3.2543823

Google Scholar

[6] T. Pham, M. Bezuijen, L. van Vliet, K. Schutte, and C. Hendriks, Performance of optimal registration estimators, in Proc. SPIE Visual Information Processing XIV, May 2005, vol. 5817, p.133–144.

DOI: 10.1117/12.603304

Google Scholar

[7] I. Yetik and A. Nehorai, Performance bounds on image registration, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 2, Philadelphia, PA, Mar. 2005, p.117.

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2005.1415355

Google Scholar