Impact Identification in Composite Stiffened Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

A number of small mass and large mass impacts on a sensorised aircraft stiffened panel were numerically simulated. Sensor signals and the contact force history were recorded during each impact. A significant difference was noticed between the small mass and large mass impacts with respect to the contact force. To distinguish between these two types of impacts, the Fast Fourier Transform was performed on the sensor signals and a categorisation criterion was defined. Finally, two separate Artificial Neural Networks were trained to approximate the peak contact force for each type of impact. It was found that the performance of these ANNs were better than a single ANN trained for both small and large mass impacts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 525-526)

Pages:

565-568

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. Sharif Khodaei and M. Aliabadi, Damage Identification Using Lamb Waves, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 452, pp.29-32, (2011).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.452-453.29

Google Scholar

[2] I. Benedetti, M. Aliabadi, and A. Milazzo, A fast BEM for the analysis of damaged structures with bonded piezoelectric sensors, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 199, pp.490-501, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.007

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Sharif Khodaei, R. Rojas-Diaz, and M. Aliabadi, Lamb-Wave Based Technique for Impact Damage Detection in Composite Stiffened Panels, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 488, pp.5-8, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.488-489.5

Google Scholar

[4] J. Park, S. Ha, and F. K. Chang, Monitoring Impact Events Using a System-Identification Method, AIAA journal, vol. 47, pp.2011-2020, (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] M. T. Martin and J. F. Doyle, Impact force identification from wave propagation responses, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 18, pp.65-77, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(95)00022-4

Google Scholar

[6] K. Worden and W. J. Staszewski, Impact location and quantification on a composite panel using neural networks and a genetic algorithm, Strain, vol. 36, pp.61-68, (2000).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2000.tb01175.x

Google Scholar

[7] W. J. Staszewski, K. Worden, R. Wardle, and G. R. Tomlinson, Fail-safe sensor distributions for impact detection in composite materials, Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 9, p.298, (2000).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/9/3/308

Google Scholar

[8] S. Dae-Un, O. Jung-Hoon, K. Chun-Gon, and H. Chang-Sun, Impact monitoring of smart composite laminates using neural network and wavelet analysis, Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, vol. 11, pp.180-190, (2000).

DOI: 10.1106/n5e7-m37y-3mar-2kfh

Google Scholar

[9] J. Haywood, P. T. Coverley, W. J. Staszewski, and K. Worden, An automatic impact monitor for a composite panel employing smart sensor technology, Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 14, p.265, (2005).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/14/1/027

Google Scholar

[10] M. Ghajari, Z. Sharif Khodaei, and M. Aliabadi, Impact Detection Using Artificial Neural Networks, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 488, pp.767-770, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.488-489.767

Google Scholar

[11] R. Olsson, Mass criterion for wave controlled impact response of composite plates, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 31, pp.879-887, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00020-8

Google Scholar