Ion Beam Figuring Fabricate Effect with Different Removal Sizes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ion Beam Figure (IBF) is believed to be one of the most effective technics that can fabricate lens with nano or even sub-nano accuracy. For different sizes of IBF removal functions, the correct effects in different spatial frequency range are different. Power Spectral Density (PSD) curve can describe surface errors in full spatial frequency range, so it is a very convenient way to evaluate the quality of lens’ surface. In this paper, firstly, the principles of IBF and PSD are introduced briefly; Secondly, IBF removal functions with sizes from 2 mm to 15 mm are generated. A lens with surface error more than PV value 400nm is simulated with different sizes of IBF removal functions by Lucy-Richardson algorithm. Finally, experiments are done by IBF plant. A lens is fabricated by different sizes of removal functions and the fabricate results are tested by interferometer precisely and calculated to PSD curves. By the comparison of these curves, the IBF fabricate effects with different removal sizes are analyzed, which show that the smaller the removal size, the better the removal effect in higher spatial frequency range, but in the meantime, it will take a much longer time. Also the reasons of the difference between theory simulation and actual fabrication result are taken into account, and several influence factors are analyzed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

142-146

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Wu, A. Kumar, Extreme ultraviolet lithography: a review[J], Vac. Sci. Technol. 2007, B 25 1743-1761

Google Scholar

[2] S. Hector, P. Mangat, Review of progress in extreme ultraviolet lithography masks[J]. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2001, B 19 2612-2616

DOI: 10.1116/1.1408957

Google Scholar

[3] Gallagher B. JWST mirror manufacturing status. Talk for NASA Technology Days 2006 (http://optics.nasa.gov/tech_days).

Google Scholar

[4] Marcel Demmler, Michael Zeuner, Frank Allenstein et al, Ion beam figuring for high precision optics[C], Proc. Of SPIE, 2010, vol. 7591 75910Y-1-75910Y-9

Google Scholar

[5] Martin Weiser, Ion beam figuring for lithography optics[J], Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 2009, 267, 1390-1393

DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.01.051

Google Scholar

[6] Olivier B.Duchemin, An investigation of ion engine erosion by low energy sputtering[D], Ph. D Dissertation, 2001. California Institute of Technology

Google Scholar

[7] Iain D.Boyd and Michael L.Falk. A review of spacecraft material sputtering[C], 37th Joint Propulsion Conference, 2001,Salt Lake City. 3353/1-3353/22

DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-3353

Google Scholar

[8] Lucy, L. B. An iterative techniques for the rectification of observed distribution[J], Astronomical Journal, 1974, 79 (6): 745–754.

Google Scholar

[9] Elson J. M, Bennett J. M. Calculation of the power spectral density from surface profile data[J ]. Applied Optics, 1995, 34 (1): 201-208.

DOI: 10.1364/ao.34.000201

Google Scholar