Inverse Identification of CDM Model Parameters for DP1000 Steel Sheets Using a Hybrid Experimental-Numerical Methodology Spanning Various Stress Triaxiality Ratios

Article Preview

Abstract:

A hybrid experimental-numerical methodology is presented for the identification of the model parameters regarding a mixed hardening anisotropic finite plasticity fully coupled with isotropic ductile damage in which the micro-crack closure effect is given account for, for steel sheets made of DP1000. The experimental tests involve tensile tests with smooth and pre-notched specimens and shear tests with specimen morphologies recently proposed by D.R. Shouler, J.M. Allwood (Design and use of a novel sample design for formability testing in pure shear, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 210, Issue 10, 1 July 2010, Pages 1304-1313). These tests cover stress triaxiality ratios lying between 0 (pure shear) and 1/√3 (plane strain). To neutralize machine stiffness effects displacements of the chosen material surface pixels are kept track of using the digital image correlation system ARAMIS, where recorded inputs are synchronized with force measurements. On the numerical part, developed constitutive model is implemented as user defined material subroutine, VUMAT, for ABAQUS/Explicit. FE models for the test cases are built using 3D brick elements (rather than thin shells) and devising developed VUMAT for the constitutive model, model parameters are identified using an inverse parameter identification procedure where the objective function relies on the difference of experimentally observed-numerically predicted forces for the selected pixel displacements. The validity of the material model and transferability of its parameters are tested using tests involving complex strain paths.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

2103-2110

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Badreddine, K. Sannouni, A. Dogui, On non-associative anisotropic finite plasticity fully coupled with isotropic ductile damage for metal forming, International Journal of Plasticity. 26(2010) 1541-1575.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.008

Google Scholar

[2] C. Soyarslan, A.E. Tekkaya, A damage coupled orthotropic finite plasticity model for sheet metal forming: CDM approach, Computational Materials Science. 48(2010) 150-165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.022

Google Scholar

[3] K. Saanouni, N. Belamri, P. Autesserre, Finite element simulation of 3D sheet metal guillotining using advanced fully coupled elasto-plastic damage constitutive equations, Journal of Finite Elements in Analysis & Design, 46 (2010) 535-550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2010.02.002

Google Scholar

[4] K. Sannouni, Damage mechanics in metal forming. Advanced modelling and numerical simulation, ISTE/Wiley, London 2012.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Li, M.W. Fu, J. Lu, H. Yang, Ductile fracture: Experiments and computations, International Journal of Plasticity. 27( 2011) 147-180.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001

Google Scholar

[6] Diego J. Celentano, Jean-Louis Chaboche, Experimental and numerical characterization of damage evolution in steels, International Journal of Plasticity. 23(2007) 1739-1762.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.008

Google Scholar

[7] P.-A. Eggertsen and K. Mattiasson, An efficient inverse approach for material hardening parameter identification from a three-point bending test, Engineering with Computers. 26(2010) 159-170 .

DOI: 10.1007/s00366-009-0149-y

Google Scholar

[8] M. Khelifa, M. Oudjene, A. Khennane, Fracture in sheet metal forming: Effect of ductile damage evolution, Computers & Structures. 85(2007) 205-212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.053

Google Scholar

[9] X Gao, G Zhang, A Study on the Effect of the StressState on Ductile Fracture,International Journal of Damage Mechanics. 19(2010) 75-94.

Google Scholar

[10] Nicola Bonora, Domenico Gentile, A. Pirondi, GolamNewaz, Ductile damage evolution under triaxial state of stress: theory and experiments, International Journal of Plasticity. 21(2005) 981-1007.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.003

Google Scholar

[11] Yoshida, Y, Ishikawa, T, Determination of ductile damage parameters by notched plate tensile test using image analysis, terials Research Innovations.15(2011) 422-425.

DOI: 10.1179/143307511x12858957675390

Google Scholar

[12] Fethi Abbassi et al., Effect of Ductile Damage Evolution in Sheet Metal Forming: Experimental and Numerical Investigations, Key Engineering Materials. 446(2010) 157-169.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.446.157

Google Scholar

[13] Q. Yin, C. Soyarslan, A. Güner, A. Brosius, A.E. Tekkaya, A cyclic twin bridge shear test for the identification of kinematic hardening parameters, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 59(2012) 31-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.02.008

Google Scholar

[14] Y.G. An, H. Vegter, J. Heijne, Development of simple shear test for the measurement of work hardening, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 209(2009) 4248-4254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.11.007

Google Scholar

[15] E.F Rauch, Plastic anisotropy of sheet metals determined by simple shear tests, Materials Science and Engineering: A. 241 (1998) 179-183.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00486-3

Google Scholar

[16] D.R. Shouler, J.M. Allwood, Design and use of a novel sample design for formability testing in pure shear, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 210(2010) 1304-1313.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.019

Google Scholar