CAD/CAM Strategies for a Parallel Kinematics SPIF Machine

Abstract:

Single point incremental forming has attracted the interest of researchers in the last decade for the production of prototypes and small batch production of sheet-based parts [1, 2]. This technique allows the manufacture of parts without using expensive die sets. The SPIF (Single point incremental forming) process can be performed on different equipments such as adapted CNC milling machines, serial robots and built proposed machines [3]. Every solution has advantages and disadvantages. This work presents the CAD/CAM strategies for a parallel kinematics SPIF machine, designed and built at the University of Aveiro [3]. This machine brings a new approach to the SPIF industry. The machinery used to perform SPIF operations has limitations in their work volume with limited movements and in the magnitude of applicable forces. With that in mind, this machine was projected to overcome that obstacle, and was provided with a system with 6 degrees of freedom, while maintaining the ability to apply high loads. The disadvantage is the increase in volume occupied by the kinematic system. The manufacture of new parts could be reached out with more flexibility on the chosen tool path. The first step is the product design in the commercial CAD system. Next step is generating the tool path of the forming tool. This step is very important to achieve the desired part shape. It is used a commercial CAM system (EdgeCAM 2012®), which has resources from three up to five axis strategies. The last step is to send the information to the machine’s control system, based on real-time software. This paper will describe each step with more details.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)
• Pages: 2221-2229
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.2221
• Online since: June 2013
• Authors: João B.S. Farias, Miguel A.B.E. Martins, Daniel Gil Afonso, Sonia R.H. Marabuto, Jorge A. Ferreira, Ricardo J. Alves de Sousa
• Keywords: CAD/CAM, Machine Design, Parallel Kinematics, Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF), Tool Path

References

[1] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J. Duflou, J. Alwood, Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology. 54 (2005) 88-114.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

[2] P.A.F. Martins, M. Bay, N. Skjoet, M.B. Silva, Theory of single point incremental forming, CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology. 57 (2008) 247-252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.047

[3] S.R. Marabuto, D. Afonso, J.A.F. Ferreira, R.Q. Melo, M. Martins, R.J. Alves de Sousa, Finding the best machine for SPIF operations. A brief discussion, Key Engineering Materials. 473 (2011) 861-868.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.473.861

[4] Amino, H., Lu, Y., Maki, T., Osawa, S., Fukuda, K., Dieless NC Forming, Prototype of Automotive Service Parts, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing (ICRPM), Beijing 2002.

[5] J.M. Allwood, N.E. Houghton, K.P. Jackson, The design of an Incremental Forming machine, 11th Conference on Sheet Metal.471-478, Erlangen 2005.

[6] J.R. Duflou, A. Szekeres, A. VanHerck, Force Measurements for Single Point Incremental Forming and experimental study, Journal of Advanced Materials Research. 6-8 (2005) 441 – 448.

[7] M. Shim, J. Park, The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 113 (2001) 654-658.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00679-3

[8] L. Fratini, G. Ambrogio, R. Di Lorenzo, L. Filice, F. Micari, Influence of mechanical properties of the sheet material on formability in single point incremental forming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 53–154 (2004) 501-507.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60680-5

[9] L. Filice, L. Fratini, F. Micari, Analysis of Material Formability in Incremental Forming, Annals of the CIRP. 51 (2002) 199-202.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61499-1

[10] E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, A. Attanas, Experimental and simulative results in sheet incremental forming on CNC machines, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 152 (2004) 176–184.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.024

[11] G. Ambrogio, L. De Napoli, L. Filice, F. Gagliardi, M. Muzzupappa, Application of Incremental Forming Process for High Customized Medical Product Manufacturing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 162 (2005) 156-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.148

[12] M. Rauch, J.Y. Hascoet, J.C. Hamann, Y. Plennel, Tool path programming optimization for incremental sheet forming applications, Computer Aided Design. 41 (2009) 877-885.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2009.06.006

[13] A. Attanasio, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, L. Mazzoni, Asymmetric two points incremental forming: Improving surface quality and geometric accuracy by tool path optimization, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 197 (2008) 59-67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.053

[14] H. Zhu, N. Li, Z.J. Liu, The effect of pressing direction on the 5-axis CNC incremental forming quality, International Journal of Material Forming, 5 (2012) 227-233.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-011-1047-6