Hot Tensile Behavior of Superplastic and Commercial AA5083 Sheets at High Temperature and Strain Rate

Article Preview

Abstract:

Since the last two decades, the automotive industry has dedicated an increasing attention to the manufacturing of sheet components made of high-resistant aluminium alloys; the superplastic AA5083 grade is currently utilized in both the conventional superplastic forming and the recently patented quick plastic forming, which assures higher productivity compared to that of superplastic forming, while the commercial AA5083 grade is rarely employed. The objective of the paper is to compare the hot tensile behaviour of commercial and fine-grained AA5083 sheets when processed at high temperature and strain rate, which are typical of hot stamping processes. The results are presented and commented in terms of flow stress, anisotropy, strain at failure, microstructural and hardness features as a function of temperature and strain rate. On the basis of the obtained results, the set of optimal forming conditions for the two grades is identified.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

63-70

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Neugebauer, T. Altan, M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, A. Sterzing: Sheet metal forming at elevated temperatures, CIRP Annals. 55/2 (2006) 799-816.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.008

Google Scholar

[2] Bariani P.F., Bruschi S., Ghiotti A., Turetta A., Testing formability in the hot stamping of HSS, CIRP Annals – Manuf. Tech., 57/1 (2008) 265–268.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.049

Google Scholar

[3] Ghiotti A, Bruschi S, Borsetto F, Tribological characteristics of high strength steel sheets under hot stamping conditions, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 211/11 (2011) 1694-1700.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.05.009

Google Scholar

[4] Toros S., Ozturk F. and Ilyas Kacar, Review of warm forming of aluminum–magnesium alloys, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 207/1-3 (2008) 1–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.057

Google Scholar

[5] K. Sotoudeh, and P.S. Bate, Diffusion creep and superplasticity in aluminium alloys, Acta Materialia, 58 (2010) 1909-1920.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.034

Google Scholar

[6] Jung-Kuei Chang, Ken Takata, Koji Ichitani and Eric M. Taleff, Ductility of an aluminum-4.4 wt. pct. magnesium alloy at warm- and hot-working temperatures, Materials Science and Engineering A, 527 (2010) 3822-3828.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.042

Google Scholar

[7] J. Liu, M.J. Tan, Y. Aue-u-lan, A. Jarfors, K.S. Fong and S. Castagne, Superplastic-Like Forming of non-Superplastic AA5083 Combined with Mechanical Pre-Forming, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52/1-4 (2011) 123-129.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2729-9

Google Scholar

[8] W.P. Green, M.-.A. Kulas, A. Niazi, K. Ohishi, E.M. Taleff, P.E. Krajewski, and T.R. McNelley, Deformation and failure of a superplastic AA5083 aluminum material with a cu addition, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 37/9 (2006) 2727-2738.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02586106

Google Scholar