On the Integration of Real-Time Diagnosis and Prognosis for Scheduled Maintenance Optimization

Abstract:

Helicopters are very critical aircrafts from the point of view of fatigue loads. A structural damage could grow fast to critical size because of the wide range of manoeuvre loads. As a consequence, scheduled maintenance is a major cost during the operative life of the aircraft. The most advanced methodologies for Structural Health Monitoring and Prognostic Health Management available today are aimed to provide a real-time structural diagnosis, thus maximizing the availability of the helicopter and reducing the maintenance costs. However, on-board diagnostic systems might be gradually introduced in the current maintenance procedures, trying to minimize the risk associated to these newly developed technologies. The work presented inside this paper is about the simulation of the integration of real-time diagnosis and prognosis into a typical scheduled maintenance procedure. A diagnostic unit is capable for anomaly detection and damage quantification (in terms of crack length). It is trained with Finite Element simulated damages and tested with real experimental data. The diagnostic output is then processed in a particle filter algorithm, based on sequential importance sampling technique, aimed at refining the estimation of the structural condition as well as to update the inference on the residual useful life distribution. The coupling of real-time diagnosis with off-line measures (taken during scheduled maintenance stops) is analyzed and applied to a damage tolerant structure, trying to outline the advantages and drawbacks of the proposed approach.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 569-570)
• Pages: 1044-1051
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.1044
• Online since: July 2013
• Authors: Claudio Sbarufatti, Andrea Manes, Marco Giglio
• Keywords: Diagnosis, Health Management, Maintenance, Prognosis Management, Real-Time

References

[1] C. Boller, F.K. Chang, Y. Fujino, Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, John Wiley and Sons (2009).

[2] F. Mustapha, G. Manson, K. Worden and S.G. Pierce, Damage location in an isotropic plate using a vector of novelty indices, Mech. Syst. and Sign. Proc., 21(2007) 1885-(1906).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.06.009

[3] M. Mieloszyk, L. Skarbek, M. Krawczuk, W. Ostachowicz and A. Zak, Application of fibre Bragg grating sensors for structural health monitoring of an adaptive wing, Smart Mat. and Struct. 20, (2011).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125014

[4] K. Worden, A.D. Ball and G.R. Tomlinson, Fault location in a framework structure using neural networks, Smart Mat. and Struct., 2 (1993) 189-200.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/2/3/007

[5] M. Sahin and R.A. Shenoi, Quantification and localization of damage in beam-like structures by using artificial neural networks with experimental validation, Eng. Struct. 25, (2003) 1785-1802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.001

[6] C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes and M. Giglio, Sensor network optimization for damage detection on aluminum stiffened helicopter panels, Proc. Coupled 2011, Kos, Greece.

[7] C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes and M. Giglio, Advanced stochastic FEM-based artificial neural network for crack damage detection, Proc. Coupled 2011, Kos, Greece.

[8] C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes, M. Giglio, Performance optimization of a diagnostic system based upon a simulated strain field for fatigue damage characterization, Mech. Syst. and Sign. Proc., Under review.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.003

[9] M. Giglio, A. Manes, Crack propagation on helicopter panel: Experimental test and analysis, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75 (2008) 866–879.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.024

[10] F. Viganò, A. Manes, M. Giglio, Investigation on the Fatigue Life of an Al 8090 Helicopter Riveted T-Joint, Journal Of Aircraft, 48 (1) (2011) 315-323.

DOI: 10.2514/1.c031117

[11] M. Giglio, A. Manes, M. Fossati, U. Mariani, C. Giani, Comparison of fatigue crack propagation behaviour of Al 2024 and Al - Li 8090 Helicopter fuselage panels, J. of Test. and Eval., 38 (1) (2010) 73-82.

DOI: 10.1520/jte101909

[12] D. A Virkler, B.M. Hillberr and P.K. Goel, The statistical nature of fatigue crack propagation, Technical report AFFDL-TR-78-43 (1978), School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University.

[13] Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon and T. Clapp, A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking, IEEE Trans. on Sign. Proc. 50(2) (2002) 174-188.

DOI: 10.1109/78.978374

[14] Doucet, N. de Freitas and N. Gordon, Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice, Springer-Verlag, New York, (2001).

[15] E. Zio and G. Peloni, Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components, Rel. Eng. and Sys. Safety, 96 (2011) 403-409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.08.009

[16] F. Cadini, E. Zio and D. Avram, Model-based Monte Carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement, Rel. Eng. and Sys. Safety, 94 (2009) 752-758.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.08.003

[17] C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes and M. Giglio, Prognostic health monitoring system for the on-board assessment of crack evolution in aluminium stiffened structures, Mech. Syst. and Sign. Proc., under review.

[18] Department of USA defence, Joint Service Specification Guide – Aircraft Structures (JSSG-2006).

[19] NASGRO reference manual - version 4. 2. Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software, (2005).

[20] M. Corbetta, C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes and M. Giglio, Stochastic Definition of State Space Equation for Particle Filtering Algorithms, Chem. Eng. Trans. 33, (2013).

[21] M. Corbetta, C. Sbarufatti, A. Manes and M. Giglio, On-line Updating of Dynamic State Space Model for Bayesian Filtering through MCMC Techniques, Chem. Eng. Trans. 33, (2013).