Load versus Displacement Validation between Ruaumoko Hysteresis Program and Experimental Work on CFRP Retrofitted Precast Beam-Column Exterior Joint

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presented the load versus displacement curve for experimental work and validated with modeling results. A full-scale specimen which representing retrofitted precast RC beam-column exterior joint with corbels was tested in the laboratory under reversible lateral cyclic loading until ±1.75% interstorey drift. The specimen was rehabilitated by using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) wrapping method. Modeling work was carried out using Ruaumoko Hysteres Program. A curve representing load versus displacement for beam-column exterior joint is generated using Pampanin Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joint Hysteresis rule with reloading slip factor. The modeling result was compared with the load versus displacement curve obtained from experimental work. It was found that the hysteresis loops exhibited good agreement between experimental and modeling results. The effective stiffness, displacement ductility and equivalent viscous damping for the specimen were also discussed and compared.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 594-595)

Pages:

390-394

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mohd Rosaidi C. A. (2001). Earthquake Monitoring In Malaysia. Paper presented in the Seismic Risk Seminar on 25th September 2001, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[2] Adnan, A., Hediyawan, Mato, A., and Irsyam, M. (2005). Seismic Hazard Assessment for Peninsular Malaysia using Gumbel Distribution Method. Journal Teknologi, 42(B): 57-73, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[3] Elmas, A.Z. & Guler, K. (2010). Seismic Performance Evaluation of an Existing RC School Building. Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 30-September 3, Ohnid, Republic of Macedonia.

Google Scholar

[4] Balendra, T., Lam, N.T.K., Wilson, J.L., and Kong, K.H. (2002). Analysis of long-distance earthquake tremors and base shear demand for buildings in Singapore. Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp.99-108.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(01)00065-7

Google Scholar

[5] Carr, A.J. (2007). RUAUMOKO Manual (Volume 1: Theory). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Google Scholar

[6] Mander, J. B. (2004). Beyond ductility: The quest goes on. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 37(1), pp.35-44.

DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.37.1.35-44

Google Scholar

[7] Carr, A.J. (2008). RUAUMOKO Manual (Volume 5: Appendices). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Google Scholar

[8] Kay Dora, A.G., Abdul Hamid, N.H. & Nurfarhana Diyana, A.H. (2013).

Google Scholar