Nanohardness of CrN Coatings versus Deposition Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nanohardness of chromium nitrid coatings deposited with DC magnetron from Cr target in the reactive atmosphere with various percentual contribution of nitrogen in Ar flow was investigated to determine the influence of nitrogen content and negative bias. The nanohardness of pure Cr coating was between 11 14 GPa and the addition of 50 % of nitrogen into Ar flow resulted in the increase of coating hardness up to ~ 22 GPa. The highest hardness of the studied CrN coatings of ~ 28 GPa was achieved at 700 W power, working pressure of 0.5 Pa with 50 % of nitrogen in Ar flow and negative bias of-30 V . The increase was ascribed to the formation of near-stoichiometric CrN compounds.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

191-194

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Liu, Q. Bi, A. Matthews, EIS comparison on corrosion performance of PVD TiN and CrN coated mild steel in 0. 5 N NaCl aqueous solution, Corros. Sci. 43(2001) 1953-(1961).

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(00)00188-8

Google Scholar

[2] K. Baba, R. Hatata, Corrosion-resistant titanium nitride coatings formed on stainless steel by ion-beam-assisted deposition,  Surf. Coat Technol. 66 (1994) 368-372.

DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(94)90032-9

Google Scholar

[3] M. A. M. Ibrahim, S. F. Korablov, M. Yoshimura, Corrosion of stainless steel coated with TiN, (TiAl)N and CrN in aqueous environments, Corros. Sci. 44 (2002) 815-828.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(01)00102-0

Google Scholar

[4] R. D. Arnell, P. J. Kelly, J. W. Bradley, Recent developments in pulsed magnetron sputtering,  Surf. Coat. Technol. 188/189 (2004) 158-163.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.010

Google Scholar

[5] P. J. Kelly, O.A. Abu – Zeid, R.D. Arnell, J. Tong, The deposition of aluminium oxide coatings by reactive unbalanced magnetron sputtering, Surf. Coat. Technol. 86/87 (1996) 28-32.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(96)02997-0

Google Scholar

[6] J. O´Brien, P. J. Kelly, Characterisation studies of the pulsed dual cathode magnetron sputtering process for oxide films, Surf. Coat. Technol. 142/144 (2001) 621-627.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(01)01058-1

Google Scholar

[7] A. P. Ehisarian, P. E. Hovsepian, L. Hultman, U. Helmersson, Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of chromium nitride-based coatings deposited by high power impulse magnetron sputtering and by the combined steered cathodic arc/unbalanced magnetron technique, Thin Solid Films 457 (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.113

Google Scholar

[8] E. Foriés, R. Escobar Galindo, O. Sánchez, J.M. Albella, Growth of CrNx films by DC reactive magnetron sputtering at constant N2/Ar gas flow, Surf. Coat. Technol. 200 (2006) 6047-6053.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.09.020

Google Scholar

[9] G. Wei, et. al., Nanotribology studies of Cr, Cr2N and CrN thin films using constant and ramped load nanoscratch techniques, Surf. Coat. Technol. 146/147 (2001) 357-362.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(01)01403-7

Google Scholar

[10] J. Lin, et. al., Examination of the pulsing phenomena in pulsed-closed field unbalanced magnetron sputtering (P-CFUBMS) of Cr–Al–N thin films, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 (2007) 4640-4652.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.010

Google Scholar

[11] M. Novák, F. Lofaj, P. Hviščová, The influence of indentation conditions on nanohardness depth profiles of W-C based coatings: submitted to Key Engineering Materials in Local Mechanical Properties 2013 (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.606.175

Google Scholar

[12] EN ISO 14577-1: 2002, Metallic materials – Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters – Part 1, Test method.

DOI: 10.3403/02697842

Google Scholar

[13] J. Lin, et. al., CrN/AlN superlattice coatings synthesized by pulsed closed field unbalanced magnetron sputtering with different CrN layer thicknesses, Thin Solid Films 517 (2009) 5798-5804.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.136

Google Scholar