Cost-Efficient Measurement System Analysis for Small-Batch Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an approach for the selection of methods for the proof of capability of measurement processes according to the risk connected to a false decision. High risks demand more reliable and therefore cost-intensive methods, a low risk allowing for cost-efficient methods with lower reliability. This approach, which is incorporated into the upcoming guideline VDI/VDE 2600-1, allows manufacturers to reduce efforts and costs associated with measurement process evaluation according to the risks and consequences of erroneous decisions deriving from measurement results. To be able to decide for the economically optimal measurement process solution, a cost model for the processes described in the VDI/VDE 2600-1 is presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

417-427

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Thomson, W. (1883). Electrical units of measurement. Being one of the series of lectures delivered at the Institution of Civil Engineers, session 1882-83. London.

Google Scholar

[2] Aamodt, A., Nygård, M. (1995). Different roles and mutual dependencies of data, information, and knowledge—an ai perspective on their integration. Data & Knowledge Engineering 16(3), 191–222.

DOI: 10.1016/0169-023x(95)00017-m

Google Scholar

[3] Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Google Scholar

[4] Saussure, F. d. (2001). Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft, De-Gruyter-Studienbuch. Berlin [u. a. ]: de Gruyter, 3 edition.

Google Scholar

[5] North, K. (op. 1999). Wissensorientierte Unternehmensführung: Wertschöpfung durch Wissen, Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2 edition.

Google Scholar

[6] Schmitt, R., Lose, J., Harding, M. (2010). The management of measurement processes - key to robust and cost optimal producation of high quality products. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 1(1), 1–6.

DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2010010

Google Scholar

[7] (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] Brinkmann, R. (2005). Measurement system analysis (msa) und prüfprozesseignung (richtlinie vda5). VDI Berichte 1913 (1913), 63–71.

Google Scholar

[9] BIPM, I. E.C., IFCC, ILAC, IUPAC, IUPAP, ISO, OIML (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—guide for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. jcgm 100: (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] AIAG (2011). Measurement system analysis (msa).

Google Scholar

[11] ISO (2012). Statistical methods in process management: Capability and performance: Part 7: Capability of measurement processes.

Google Scholar

[12] VDI/VDE (2012). Prüfprozessmanagement - identifizierung, klassifizierung und eignungsnachweise von prüfprozessen.

Google Scholar

[13] Kunzmann, H., Pfeifer, T., Schmitt, R., Schwenke, H., Weckenmann, A. (2005). Productive metrology – adding value to manufacture. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 54(2), 155–168.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60024-9

Google Scholar

[14] Savio, E. (2012). A methodology for the quantification of value-adding by manufacturing metrology. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 61(1), 503–506.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.019

Google Scholar

[15] Baumann, A., Kirchner, A., Maier, M., Rohde, G., Kobens, G. (2009). Produktionsorganisation: Qualitätsmanagement und Produktpolitik. Haan-Gruiten: Europa- Lehrmittel, 6 edition.

Google Scholar

[16] Schmidt, A. (2008). Kostenrechnung: Grundlagen der Vollkosten-, Deckungsbeitrags-und Planungskostenrechnung sowie des Kostenmanagements. W. Kohlhammer Verlag.

DOI: 10.17433/978-3-17-041111-1

Google Scholar

[17] Olfert, K. (2005). Kostenrechnung, Kompendium der praktischen Betriebswirtschaft. Ludwigshafen (Rhein): Kiehl, 14 edition.

Google Scholar

[18] Olfert, K., Reichel, C. (2009). Investition, Kompendium der praktischen Betriebswirtschaft. Ludwigshafen (Rhein): Kiehl, 11 edition.

Google Scholar

[19] Warnecke, H. -J. (1996). Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung für Ingenieure: Mit Tabellen sowie 3 ausführlichen Fallstudien, Hanser-Studienbücher. München and Wien: Hanser, 3 edition.

Google Scholar

[20] Coenenberg, A. G., Fischer, T. M., Günther, T. (2007). Kostenrechnung und Kostenanalyse. Stuttgart: Schäffer- Poeschel, 6 edition.

Google Scholar

[21] Hering, E., Braun, J. (2003). Qualitätsmanagement für Ingenieure: Mit 116 Tabellen, Engineering online library. Berlin and Heidelberg and New York and Hongkong and London and Mailand and Paris and Tokio: Springer, 5 edition.

Google Scholar

[22] Jung, H. (2004). Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre. München and Wien: Oldenbourg, 9 edition.

Google Scholar

[23] Nadig, L. (2000). Prozesskostenrechnung in Theorie und Praxis, Vol. 3 of Kostenrechnung und Controlling. Zürich: Schulthess.

Google Scholar

[24] Dürschmid, M., Lindner, T., Linss, G. (2002). Optimierung der Prüfmittelauswahl unter Berücksichtigung von Messabweichung und Kosten: Schlussbericht. Forschungsgemeinschaft Qualitätssicherung (FQS).

Google Scholar