Formability of Magnesium Alloys AZ80 and ZE10

Article Preview

Abstract:

Formability of two magnesium alloys, namely, AZ80 and ZE10, has been investigated. Both alloys were supplied with a thickness of 0.8 mm. The grain structure of the as-received AZ80 alloy showed dislocations, twins and second-phase particles and-/or precipitates distributed uniformly within grains. These were not obvious on the ZE10 alloy. The investigations were carried out at room temperature for both alloys in the as-received and heat treated conditions (410oC for 1 hour followed by water quench). The heat treatment significantly changed the grain structure of the AZ80 alloy, but did not affect the ZE10 alloy apart from grain enlargement. The formability was studied on the basis of plastic strain ratio (r) and strain hardening coefficient (n) by means of tensile testing. In the as-received condition, the ZE10 alloy had a slightly better formability () than AZ80 alloy. Following heat treatment, however, the formability of the AZ80 alloy was improved significantly (by about 26%), while the ZE10 alloy did not show any significant change.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 622-623)

Pages:

284-291

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Liu, Y. Li, and W. Li, Stamping formability of ZE10 magnesium alloy sheets, Journal of Rare Earths, vol. 25, pp.480-484, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0721(07)60460-8

Google Scholar

[2] E. Doege and K. Dröder, Sheet metal forming of magnesium wrought alloys—formability and process technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 115, pp.14-19, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00760-9

Google Scholar

[3] M. Marya, L. G. Hector, R. Verma, and W. Tong, Microstructural effects of AZ31 magnesium alloy on its tensile deformation and failure behaviors, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 418, pp.341-356, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.003

Google Scholar

[4] I. Yakubtsov, B. Diak, C. Sager, B. Bhattacharya, W. MacDonald, and M. Niewczas, Effects of heat treatment on microstructure and tensile deformation of Mg AZ80 alloy at room temperature, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 496, pp.247-255, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.019

Google Scholar

[5] L. Stutz, J. Bohlenl, D. Letzigl, and K. U. Kainer, Formability of magnesium sheet ZE10 and AZ31 with respect to initial texture, Magnesium Technology 2011, p.373, (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48223-1_69

Google Scholar

[6] S. Yi, J. Bohlen, F. Heinemann, and D. Letzig, Mechanical anisotropy and deep drawing behaviour of AZ31 and ZE10 magnesium alloy sheets, Acta Materialia, vol. 58, pp.592-605, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.038

Google Scholar

[7] J. Bohlen, M. R. Nürnberg, J. W. Senn, D. Letzig, and S. R. Agnew, The texture and anisotropy of magnesium–zinc–rare earth alloy sheets, Acta Materialia, vol. 55, pp.2101-2112, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.013

Google Scholar

[8] P. Wang, M. Lin, H. Lin, K. Lin, M. Yeh, and C. Lin, Effects of aging treatment on microstructure and mechanical property of an AZ80N magnesium alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 527, pp.4076-4081, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.015

Google Scholar

[9] M. N. Mekonen, D. Steglich, J. Bohlen, D. Letzig, and J. Mosler, Mechanical characterization and constitutive modeling of Mg alloy sheets, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 540, pp.174-186, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.122

Google Scholar

[10] Mariusz Boba, Michael J. Worswicka, Raja Mishrab, Jon Carterb, Formability of A31B and Zek100 Magnesium Alloy Sheets at Elevated Temperatures, in Mg2012: 9th International Conference on Magnesium Alloys and their Applications, W.J. Poole and K.U. Kainer (editors), pp.397-402, (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM E646 Standard Test Method for Tensile Strain-Hardening Exponents (n-values) of Metallic Sheet Materials, (2007).

DOI: 10.1520/e0646

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM E517 Standard Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio (r), for Sheet Metal, (2010).

Google Scholar