Electrophoretic Co-Deposition of Chitosan and Graphene Oxide Results in Antibacterial Coatings for Medical Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chitosan – graphene oxide (GO) composite coatings intended for antibacterial applications were obtained by cathodic electrophoretic deposition (EPD) on stainless steel. The coatings were characterized using SEM, FTIR, contact angle and roughness measurements and by antibacterial studies against E.coli. The coating was observed to consist of a polymer matrix with embedded, agglomerated graphene oxide sheets. A decrease in bacteria cell viability of at least 50 % was measured on the chitosan – GO surface in comparison to uncoated stainless steel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

176-182

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Geetha et al,. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54, 397–425.

Google Scholar

[2] K Duan, R. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2309–2321.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Davies, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 114–122.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Ding et al., Carbohydrate Polymers 2013, 98, 1547-1552.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Ordikhani et al., Mater. Sci. and Engin.: C 2014, 41, 240-248.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Venkatesan, S. Kim, Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2252–2266.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Dash et al., Progress in Polymer Science 2011, 36, 981-1014.

Google Scholar

[8] B.L. Butler et al., J. Food Sci. 1996, 61, 953-956.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Liu et al., ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6971.

Google Scholar

[10] W. Hu et al., ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4317.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Pandey et al., Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4104.

Google Scholar

[12] A.M. Pinto et al., Colloids and Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2013, 111, 188-202.

Google Scholar

[13] L.Y. Feng et al., Biomaterials 2011, 32 (11), 2930–2937.

Google Scholar

[14] C. Peng et al., Small 2010, 6 (15), 1686–1692.

Google Scholar

[15] S.J. He et al., Adv, Funct. Mater. 2010, 20 (3), 453–459.

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Wang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (27), 9274–9276.

Google Scholar

[17] X.M. Sun et al., Nano Res. 2008, 1 (3), 203–212.

Google Scholar

[18] A.R. Boccaccini et al., J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7, 581-613.

Google Scholar

[19] A. Chavez-Valdez et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2013, 117 (6), 1502–1515.

Google Scholar

[20] O.O. van der Biest, L.J. Vandeperre, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, 327-352.

Google Scholar

[21] I. Zhitomirsky, Adv. In Colloid and Interf. Sci. 2002, 97, 279-317.

Google Scholar

[22] A. Simchi et al., Materials Letters 2009, 63, 2253-2256.

Google Scholar

[23] M. Diba et al., Carbon 2014, 67, 656-661.

Google Scholar

[24] M. Rai et al., Biotech. Adv. 2009, 27, 76-83.

Google Scholar

[25] C. Paluszkiewicz et al., Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 79, 784-788.

Google Scholar

[26] J. Tsibouklis et al., Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1229-1235.

Google Scholar

[27] J. Hasan et al., Trends in Biotechnology 2013, 31, 295-304.

Google Scholar

[28] D.A. Stout et al., in Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials 2013, 119-157.

Google Scholar