Light Directed Electrophoretic Deposition for Additive Manufacturing: Spatially Localized Deposition Control with Photoconductive Counter Electrodes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) has traditionally been viewed as a thin film deposition technique for coating conductive surfaces. Recently, there have been reports of producing functional parts with EPD to near net shape, often containing gradients in material properties normal to the conductive deposition surface. By using reconfigurable electrode systems, a few researchers have gone beyond purely out-of-plane gradients and demonstrated gradients in material properties in the plane of the deposition electrode, a necessary condition for 3D additive manufacturing. In this work, we build upon a previously published technique called light directed electrophoretic deposition (LD-EPD) in which the deposition electrode is photoconductive and can be activated with light, leading to a patterned deposit. Here, we demonstrate that the LD-EPD technique can also lead to patterned deposits on any conductive surface by utilizing the photoconductive electrode as the counter electrode. This eliminates several issues with standard LD-EPD by allowing the potentially expensive photoconductive electrode to be reused, as well as mitigates post-processing material compatibility issues by allowing deposition on any conductive surface. We also detail the results of a finite element simulation of the deposition process in LD-EPD systems that captures key features seen experimentally in the final deposit.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

261-267

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. P. Davey, February 1919. United States Patent 1, 294, 627.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Anné, K. Vanmeensel, J. Vleugels, and O. Van der Biest. Key Eng. Mater., 314: 213-218, (2006).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.314.213

Google Scholar

[3] C. Oetzel and R. Clasen. J. Mater. Sci., 41(24): 8130-8137, November (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] H. Hadraba, D. Drdlik, Z. Chlup, K. Maca, I. Dlouhy, and J. Cihlar. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 33(12): 2305-2312, October (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.01.026

Google Scholar

[5] S. Ahmed and K. M. Ryan. Adv. Mater., 20(24): 4745-4750, December (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] A. J. Krejci, J. Mandal, and J. H. Dickerson. Applied Physics Letters, 101(4): 043117-4, July (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] F. Qian, A. J. Pascall, M. Bora, T. Y. Han, S. Guo, S. Ly, M. A. Worsley, J. D. Kuntz, and T. Y. Olson. Langmuir, doi: 10. 1021/la502724n, September (2014).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Nold, T. Assion, J. Zeiner, and R. Clasen. Key Eng. Mater., 412: 307-312, (2009).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.412.307

Google Scholar

[9] A. Nold, J. Zeiner, T. Assion, and R. Clasen. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 30(5): 1163-1170, March (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] A. J. Pascall, F. Qian, G. Wang, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, and J. D. Kuntz. Adv. Mater., 26(14): 2252-2256, April (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201304953

Google Scholar

[11] A. J. Pascall, K. T. Sullivan, and J. D. Kuntz. J. Phys. Chem. B, 117(6): 1702-1707, February (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] N. M. Phuong, N. Seong, J. Ahn, E. Kim, J. Lee, G. H. Kim, and S. Yoon. Electrochem. SolidState Lett., 10(9): H284-H286, (2007).

Google Scholar