The Role of Fluorosurfactant on Cu-Sn Electrodeposition from Methanesulfonic Acid

Article Preview

Abstract:

Methanesulfonic acid (MSA) is an environmentally benign supporting electrolyte that is an attractive alternative to traditional copper and tin plating baths based on cyanide or fluoborate. This is mainly due to its low toxicity, volatility, and good biodegradability as well as other desirable characteristics for electrodeposition such as high metal salt solubility and conductivity. The role of fluorosurfactant on Cu-Sn electrodeposition from methanesulfonic acid was explored through the use of an electrochemical quartz crystal nanobalance to monitor surfactant adsorption and desorption from the electrode surface. It was found that the surfactant adsorbs on the surface and inhibits copper deposition by blocking the reduction and oxidation reaction for copper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

125-128

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2014, Available at http: /echa. europa. eu/(accessed 20. 11. 14).

Google Scholar

[2] Registration, Authorisation & restriction of CHemicals (REACH), 2014, Available at http: /www. hse. gov. uk/reach/ (accessed 20. 11. 14).

Google Scholar

[3] R. Balaji, MalathyPushpavanam, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 81 (2003) 154.

Google Scholar

[4] M.D. Gernon, M. Wu, T. Buszta, P. Janney, Green Chem. 1 (1999) 127.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Hasan, J.F. Rohan, J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 (2010) D278.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Florence, Nisha, Rajendran, S., Srinivasan, K.N., John, S., Int. J. ChemTech Res. 3 (2011) 1318.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.H. Yau, J. Electrochem. Soc. 147 (2000) 1071.

Google Scholar

[8] C.T.J. Low, F.C. Walsh, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 5280.

Google Scholar

[9] C.T.J. Low, F.C. Walsh, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2008) 1339.

Google Scholar

[10] C.T.J. Low, F.C. Walsh, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 86 (2008) 315.

Google Scholar

[11] N. Pewnim, S. Roy, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 89 (2011) 206.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Schlesinger, M. Paunovic, Modern Electroplating, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] N.M. Martyak, R. Seefeldt, Electrochim. Acta 49 (2004) 4303.

Google Scholar

[14] C. Cachet, M. Keddam, V. Mariotte, R. Wiart, Electrochim. Acta 37 (1992) 2377.

Google Scholar

[15] C. Cachet, M. Keddam, V. Mariotte, R. Wiart, Electrochim. Acta 39 (1994) 2743.

Google Scholar

[16] C.S. Cha, Y.B. Zu, Langmuir 14 (1998) 6280.

Google Scholar

[17] C.T.J. Low, F.C. Walsh, J. Electroanal. Chem. 615 (2008) 91.

Google Scholar

[18] N. Pewnim, S. Roy, Electrochim. Acta 90 (2013) 498.

Google Scholar

[19] G. Sauerbrey, Z. Phys. 155 (1959) 206.

Google Scholar

[20] D.P. K. Johannsen, S. Roy, Electrochim. Acta 45 (2000) 3691.

Google Scholar