Process Optimization of Lapping Sapphire Substrate with Fixed Diamond Abrasive Pad

Article Preview

Abstract:

The production cost of the sapphire substrate was restricted by the efficiency of processing and the surface quality. A proposed level orthogonal experiment was conducted to reveal the effect of workbench speed, lapping pressure, the Concentration of triethanolamine and abrasive pad types on the material removal rate and surface roughness and morphology of sapphire substrate when lapped with a diamond fixed-abrasive pad. The results showed that the average material removal rate of sapphire is about 24μm/min, and the surface roughness Ra achieves 0.36μm when the 200/230 mesh diamond fixed-abrasive pad was used. The material removal rate and the surface roughness as the optimization goal, the optimal lapping parameters were as follows: the lapping pad with raised, lapping pressure 0.075MPa, workbench speed 120rpm and the Concentration of triethanolamine 1%. Under these optimal machining parameters, the material removal rate reached 42μm /min and the surface roughness Ra reached 0.37μm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1090-1097

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y Z Wang, G L Pang, S L Liu, S Z Li, J Zou, S M Zhou, J Xu, Journal of Crystal Growth, 34(2005): 431-434.

Google Scholar

[2] D H Wen, T Hong, K H Zhang, C D Lu, Optics and Precision Engineering, 17(2009): 2493-2798.

Google Scholar

[3] Z Z Zhou, D H Wen, K H Zhang, C D Lu, J L Yuan, China Mechanical Engineering, 19(2008): 2549-2552.

Google Scholar

[4] K L Zhang, Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 5(2008): 1-6.

Google Scholar

[5] H M Kim , R Manivannan, D J Moon, H L Xiong, J G Park, Wear, 302(2013), 1340-1344.

Google Scholar

[6] T. G. Bifano, P. A. Bierden, Int. J. Mach Tools Manufacture, 37(1997): 935-946.

Google Scholar

[7] H M Kim, R. Manivannan, D J Moon, J G Park, Wear 302 (2013): 1334-1339.

Google Scholar

[8] P Van, D Velden, Microelectronic Engineering, 50 (2000): 41-46.

Google Scholar

[9] B H Lv, J L Yuan, Y X Yao, Z W Wang, Materials Science Form, 532(2006): 460-463.

Google Scholar

[10] J Y Choi, H D Jeong, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44(2004): 1163-1169.

Google Scholar

[11] K Lin, Y W Zhu, J Li, M Li, D W Zuo, Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 29(2010): 6-11.

Google Scholar

[12] Y W Zhu, J Wang, J Li, K Lin, China Mechanical Engineering, 20(2009): 723-727.

Google Scholar

[13] J B Wang, Y W Zhu, J S Wang, J Xu, D W Zuo, Journal of Synthetic Crystals, 2014, 43(2014): 1099-1104.

Google Scholar

[14] F. Mess, J. Levert, S. Danyluk, Wear, 211 (1997): 311-315.

Google Scholar

[15] P D Funkenbusch, Y Y Zhou, T Takahashi, D Golini, Wear, 218(1998): 1-7.

Google Scholar

[16] Z C Lin, W S Huang, J S Tsai, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(2012): 2353-2364.

Google Scholar

[17] Z F Zhang, W X Yan, L Zhang, W L Liu, Z T Song, Microelectronic Engineering, 88(2011): 3020-3023.

Google Scholar

[18] J Seok, P Cyriaque, S Kam, T Andrew, Kim, A T John, S Timothy, Wear, 257(2004): 496-508.

Google Scholar