Influence of Antibiotics Addition in Bone Cements for Hip Arthroplasty on their Mechanical Properties: Clinical Perspective and In Vitro Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bone cement has been used for over half a century, to successfully anchor artificial joints. From its emergence there have appeared a number of types of bone cement, with the 2 major classes being bone cement with or without active substances. The one with the added antibiotics is used primarily in the treatment and revision surgery of infected total hip arthroplasty (THA), as well as a prophylactic method in primary THA in patients with high risks for this complication. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanical properties of bone cement with added antibiotics. Over a period of 2 years, a number of 41 cases were chosen for this study: 25 with revision surgery for THA, where bone cement with antibiotics was used, and 16 with primary THA, where regular bone cement was used. A number of studies have been performed on the mechanical properties of the 2 types of cement, which determined that the cement with antibiotics presents a slightly lower compressive strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus and fatigue strength compared with regular cement. These variations, however, become more pronounced as the quantity of the antibiotic goes up. The mechanical properties of the cement with antibiotics are similar with those of the regular cement, when low doses of antibiotics are used and become more evident as the doses go up. In conclusion, the antibiotic bone cement is a trustworthy tool in the surgeon’s arsenal against infection, with minimal detriments from the mechanical view.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

123-127

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Charnley J. Repair of bone in contact with acrylic cement. In: Acrylic cement in orthopaedic surgery. E & S Livingstone, Edinburgh (1970) pp.67-71.

Google Scholar

[2] Lewis G, Bhattaram A. Influence of a pre-blended antibiotic (gentamicin sulfate powder) on various mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of three acrylic bone cements J Biomater Appl. 2006 Apr; 20(4): 377-408.

DOI: 10.1177/0885328206055124

Google Scholar

[3] Huo MH, Waldman BJ. Cemented total hip replacement. In: Clinical orthopaedics. Craig EV (ed). Lippincott Williams & Williams, Baltimore (1999) pp.522-534.

Google Scholar

[4] Park JB. Orthopaedic prosthesis fixation. In: The biomedical engineering handbook. Bronzino JD (ed). CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton (1995) pp.704-723.

Google Scholar

[5] Jaeblon T (2010). Polymethylmethacrylate: properties and contemporary uses in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18: 297-305.

Google Scholar

[6] Josefsson G, Kolmert L. Prophylaxis with systematic antibiotics versus gentamicin bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year survey of 1, 688 hips. Clin Orthop. 1993; 292: 210-214.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199307000-00026

Google Scholar

[7] Wentworth SJ, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Southworth CB. Hip prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for the treatment of infections following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84 (Suppl): 123-128.

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200200002-00017

Google Scholar

[8] Adams K, Couch l, Cierny G, Calhoun J, Mader JT (1992). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic-impregnated polymethymethacrylate beads. Clin Orthop 278: 244–252.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199205000-00037

Google Scholar

[9] Persson C, Baleani M, Guandalini L, Tigani D, Viceconti M. Mechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77(4): 617-21.

DOI: 10.1080/17453670610012692

Google Scholar

[10] Nijhof MW, Stallmann HP, Vogely HC et al. Prevention of infection with tobramycin-containing bone cement or systemic cefazolin in an animal model. J Biomed Mater Res (2000) 52: 709-715.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<709::aid-jbm16>3.0.co;2-w

Google Scholar

[11] Schurman DJ, Trindade C, Hirshman HP, Moser K, Kajiyama G, Stevens P. Antibiotic-acrylic bone cement composites. Studies of gentamicin and Palacos. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1978) 60: 978-984.

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860070-00019

Google Scholar

[12] Wahlig H, Dingeldein E, Buchholz HW, Buchholz M, Bachmann F. Pharmacokinetic study of gentamicin-loaded cement in total hip replacements. Comparative effects of varying dosage. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1984) 66: 175-179.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.66b2.6707051

Google Scholar

[13] Van de Belt H, Neut D, Schenk W, Van Horn JR, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on different gentamicin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cements. Biomaterials (2001) 22: 1607-1611.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00313-6

Google Scholar

[14] Koo KH, Yang JW, Cho SH et al. Impregnation of vancomycin, gentamicin, and cefotaxime in a cement spacer for two-stage cementless reconstruction in infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (2001) 16: 882-892.

DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.24444

Google Scholar

[15] Kuehn KD, Ege W, Gopp U. Acrylic bone cements: composition and properties. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jan; 36(1): 17-28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.06.010

Google Scholar

[16] Chiu FY, Chen CM, Lin CF, Lo WH (2002) Cefuroxime-impregnated cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study of three hundred and forty knees. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 84: 759-762.

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200205000-00009

Google Scholar

[17] Parvizi J, Saleh KJ, Ragland PS, Pour AE, Mont MA (2008) Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip Replacement: A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 79: 335-341.

DOI: 10.1080/17453670710015229

Google Scholar

[18] Bourne RB (2004) Prophylactic use of antibiotic bone cement: an emerging standard in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 19: 69–72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.005

Google Scholar

[19] He Y, Trotignon JP, Loty B, Tcharkhtchi A, Verdu J. Effect of antibiotics on the properties of poly(-methylmethacrylate)-based bone cement. Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 63: 800-806.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10405

Google Scholar

[20] Powles JW, Spencer RF, Lovering AM. Gentamicin release from old cement during revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 607-610.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b4.0800607

Google Scholar

[21] Thomes B, Murray P, Bouchier-Hayes D. Development of resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis on gentamicin-loaded bone cement in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 758-760.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b5.0840758

Google Scholar

[22] Jiranek WA, Hanssen AD, Greenwald AS (2006) Antibiotic-loaded bone cement for infection prophylaxis in total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 88: 2487-2500.

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.e.01126

Google Scholar

[23] Isefuku S, Joyner CJ, Simpson AH. Gentamicin may have an adverse effect on osteogenesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17: 212-216.

DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200303000-00010

Google Scholar

[24] Virto MR, Frutos P, Torrado S, Frutos G. Gentamicin release from modified acrylic bone cements with lactose and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Biomaterials (2003) 24: 79-87.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00254-5

Google Scholar

[25] Haddad FS, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Manktelow AR, Bacarese-Hamilton I. Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br (2000) 82: 689-694.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.0820689

Google Scholar