Advanced External Sulfate Attack Testing and Performance Specifications: Different Sample Geometries Testing

Abstract:

External sulfate attacks induce severe deterioration of concrete because of several phenomena: leaching, precipitation of expansive products, aggregates loss, and cracking. A new methodology has been developed to assess sulfate resistance of cement-based materials. We can actually estimate the nature of leached and precipitated minerals, and the microscopic volume variations due to each of the principal sulfate attack phenomena, from relatively simple monitoring parameters: sample mass, hydrostatic weighing, and the amount of leached hydroxide. Quantitative information is given on the mineralogical volume or mass variations, leading us to a phenomena decoupling and a better understanding of the sulfate attack mechanism. After we established the microscopic volume variation scenario, we defined a new performance criterion, the averaged density, capable to describe the tested sample performance variation according to the sample internal state indications given by this criterion. We applied the developed strategy on three different filled and hollow geometries in order to study the effect of the sample geometry on sulfate attack mechanism. The study shows almost the same degradation mechanism: the same microscopic volume variations entrained by the different sulfate attack phenomena. However the hollow tubes promote different precipitated mineral than the two others geometries, due to the different ionic and pH profiles between filled and hollow samples which affects the nature of formed sulfate minerals.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 711)
• Pages: 1045-1052
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.1045
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: Georges Massaad*, Emmanuel Roziere, Ahmed Loukili, Laurent Izoret
• Keywords: Monitoring Strategy, Performance Indicator, Sample Geometry, Sulfate Attack Mechanism

References

[1] A. Chabrélie, K. Scrivener, Mechanism of degradation of concreteby external sulfate ions under loboratory and field conditions, Ecole polytechnique Fedérale De Lausane, (2010).

[2] M. Santhanam,M. D. Cohen, J. Olek, Mechanism of sulftate attack: A fresh look, Part 1: Summary of experimental results, Cement And Concrete Research, (2002), 915-921.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00724-x

[3] ASTM C 1012- 95a (2000) Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, volume 04. 01 cement; lime; gypsum, (2000).

DOI: 10.1520/c1012-03

[4] D.D. Higgins (2003) Increased sulfate resistance of ggbs concrete in the presence of carbonate, Cement and Concrete Composites 25 (2003) 913-919.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(03)00148-3

[5] D. Planel, Sercombe J., Le Bescop P., Adenot F., Torrenti J. -M. (2006) Long-term performance of cement paste during combined calcium leaching-sulfate attack : kinetics and size effect, Cement and Concrete Research 36, 137-143.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.039

[6] R. El Hachem, E. Rozière, F. Grondin, A. Loukili, New procedure to investigate external sulfate attack on cementitious materials, Cement and Concrete Composites, Volume 34, Issue 3, 357-364, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.11.010

[7] R. El Hachem, E. Rozière, F. Grondin, A. Loukili, Multi-criteria analysis of the mechanism of degradation of Portland cement based mortars exposed to external sulfate attack, Cement and Concrete Research 42 1327–1335, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.06.005