Effect of Mean Stress on 2A12-T4 Aluminum Alloy under Tension-Torsion Constant Amplitude Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fatigue tests have been carried out to investigate the effects of mean-stress and phase-difference on the tension-torsion fatigue failure of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy. The results show that for fully reversed tension-torsion loading, the fatigue life increases with the increase of phase angle, but the fatigue life decreases with the increase of phase angle, when mean-stress exists, both for shear mean-stress and normal mean-stress. Fracture appearance shows that the crack initiation is on the direction of maximum shear stress amplitude plane. Critical plane criteria based on the linear combination of the maximum shear stress amplitude and maximum normal stress are studied and further discussion on the drawbacks of this kind of criteria are performed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

334-337

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Adam, B. Michal: Int J Fatigue, Vol. 52 (2013), p.49.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Davoli, A. Bernasconi, M. Filippini, S. Foletti, I. V. Papadopoulos: Int J Fatigue, Vol. 25 (2003), pp.471-480.

Google Scholar

[3] A. R. Kallmeyer, A. Krgo, P. J. Kurath: ENG MATER-T ASME, Vol. 124 (2002), pp.229-237.

Google Scholar

[4] S. George: Technical Report Archive & Image Library, Vol. 56. 7 (1955), pp.101-112.

Google Scholar

[5] D. L. Mcdiarmid: Fatig Fract Eng Mater Struct, Vol. 9. 6 (1987), p.457–475.

Google Scholar

[6] I. V. Papadopoulos, P. Davoli, C. Gorla: Int J Fatigue, Vol. 19. 3 (1997), p.219–235.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Susmel, P. Lazzarin: Fatig Fract Eng Mater Struct, Vol. 25. 1 (2002), pp.63-78.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Erickson, A. R. Kallmeyer, R. H. Van Stone, P. Kurath: Trans ASME, J Eng Mater Technol, Vol. 130 (2008), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Papuga: Int J Fatigue Vol. 2. 2 (2011), pp.153-165.

Google Scholar