Numerical Modelling of AlSi7 Tubular Components Flowformed at Elevated Temperature

Abstract:

In small batch manufacturing, flowforming may represent an optimal semi-finishing process for axisymmetric parts, due to its versatility, the reduced material waste, the good geometrical tolerances as well as the improvement of the mechanical characteristics it allows to attain. However, the main limiting factor often lies in the lack of knowledge for the process design, which implies expensive industrial trials often based on trial-and-error approaches. Due to these reasons Finite Element (FE) numerical simulation can provide a significant help in the design and management of the process, but its application is still facing relevant issues, mainly linked to: (i) the complex contact conditions between tooling and part, (ii) the high computation effort due to the 3D geometry rotating at high speed, and (iii) the complex strain paths that the material undergoes.The paper presents an optimized FE model of the flowforming process of AlSi7 alloy tubular components carried out at elevated temperature. An implicit solution scheme and an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian meshing was adopted, while the constitutive parameters of the material model were calibrated on the basis of experimental compression tests carried out in the same thermo-mechanical conditions of the industrial reference process. The influence of the main process parameters, namely thickness reduction, feed rate and mandrel rotation speed were investigated and an algorithm for parametric process charts derivation was finally proposed.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 716)
• Pages: 753-761
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.716.753
• Online since: October 2016
• Authors: Michele Francesco Novella*, Andrea Ghiotti, Stefania Bruschi, Riccardo Capuzzo
• Keywords: Finite Element, Flow Forming, Hot Metal Forming, Sensitivity Analysis

References

[1] S. Kalpakjian, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 1995, p.384.

[2] K. Mori, M. Ishiguro, Y. Isomura, Hot shear spinning of cast aluminium alloy parts, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 209 (2008) 3621-3627.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.018

[3] C.C. Wong, T.A. Dean, J. Lin, A review of spinning, shear forming and flow forming processes, Int. J. Mach. T. Man. 43 (2003) 1419-1435.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00172-x

[4] O. Music, J.M. Alwood, K. Kawai, A review of the mechanics of metal spinning, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 210 (2010) 3-23.

[5] J.H. Liu, H. Yang, Y.Q. Li, A study of the stress and strain distributions of first-pass conventional spinning under different roller-traces, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 129 (2002) 326-329.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00682-9

[6] K. Mori, T. Nonaka, Simplified three-dimensional Finite Element simulation of shear spinning process based on axisymmetric modeling, J. Manuf. Proc. 7-1 (2005) 51-56.

DOI: 10.1016/s1526-6125(05)70081-5

[7] E. Quigley, J. Monaghan, Enhanced finite element models of metal spinning, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 121 (2002) 42-49.

[8] E. Quigley, J. Monaghan, The finite element modelling of conventional spinning using multi-domain models, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 12 (2002) 360-365.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00259-5

[9] M. Zhan, H. Yang, J.H. Zhang, Y.L. Xu, F. Ma, 3D FEM analysis of influence of roller feed rate on forming force and quality of cone spinning, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 187-188 (2007) 486-491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.114

[10] G. Sebastiani, A. Brosius, R. Ewers, M. Kleiner, C. Klimmek, Numerical investigation on dynamic effects during sheet metal spinning by explicit finite-element-analysis, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 177 (2006) 401-403.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.080

[11] F.A. Hua, Y.S. Yang, Y.N. Zhang, M.H. Guo, D.Y. Guo, W.H. Tong, Z.Q. Hu, Three-dimensional finite element analysis of tube spinning, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 168 (2005) 68-74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.014

[12] M.J. Roy, D.M. Maijer, Analysis and modelling of a rotary forming process for cast aluminium alloy A356, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 226 (2015) 188-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.036

[13] M.J. Roy, D.M. Maijer, R.J. Klassen, J.T. Wood, E. Schost, Analytical solution of the tooling/workpiece contact interface shape during a flowforming operation, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 210 (2010) 1976-(1985).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.011

[14] M.J. Roy, D.M. Maijer, Response of A356 to warm rotary forming and subsequent T6 heat treatment, Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 611 (2014) 223-233.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.088