Unconventional Methods of Sintering Inconel 718 MIM Samples

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this investigation, three different ways of sintering Inconel 718 MIM samples are compared. The conventional way of sintering in a furnace will be compared to FAHP and microwave sintering. The difficulty of these two methods is to be able to control the shrinkage of the sample and so its shape. These methods have yet not been investigated with a super alloy powder and so, the effects of a high sintering rate on a MIM sample. By accelerating the sintering kinetics, the thermal behavior may be modified. Hence, the behavior of the Inconel 718 sintered by field assisted and microwave sintering has been investigated. The sintered samples were all injected from a feedstock composed of a fine particle Inconel powder and a binder principally composed of CAB and PEG. They were debinded into water for 24h and put in a furnace at 500°C during 2 hours. The heating rate of the furnace was set to 5°C/min until 1290°C during 2 hours. The heating rate of the FAHP was set to 50°C/min until 1250°C during 15 minutes. The microwave samples were sintered around 1300°C during 1 hour, the temperature was increased progressively by steps of 100°C. The effects of the different process on the microstructure and the mechanical properties are then compared. There was no difference in distribution of pores between the conventional sintering and the FAHP sintering but a finer grain size showed better hardness. The microwave sintering of a MIM sample is more complex and the best properties were not obtained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

830-839

Citation:

Online since:

October 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Chang, W. Sun, Y. Cui, F. Zhang, R. Yang, Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of the hot-isostatic-pressed Inconel 718 powder compact, J. Alloy. Compd. 590 (2014) 227–232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.107

Google Scholar

[2] F. Jafarian, M. Imaz Ciaran, D. Umbrello, P.J. Arrazola, L. Filice, H. Amirabadi, Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 88 (2014) 110–121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.007

Google Scholar

[3] H. Zhang, R.M. German, Homogeneity and properties of injection moulded Fe-Ni alloys, Met. Powder Rep. 56 (2001) 18–22.

DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0657(01)80323-4

Google Scholar

[4] R.M. German, 1 - Metal powder injection molding (MIM): key trends and markets, in: D.F. Heaney (Ed. ), Handb. Met. Inject. Molding, Woodhead Publishing, 2012: p.1–25.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857096234.1

Google Scholar

[5] Ö. Özgün, H.Ö. Gülsoy, R. Yılmaz, F. Fındık, Microstructural and mechanical characterization of injection molded 718 superalloy powders, J. Alloy. Compd. 576 (2013) 140–153.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.042

Google Scholar

[6] R. Muñoz-Moreno, E.M. Ruiz-Navas, B. Srinivasarao, J.M. Torralba, Microstructural Development and Mechanical Properties of PM Ti–45Al–2Nb–2Mn–0. 8 vol. %TiB2 Processed by Field Assisted Hot Pressing, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 30 (2014) 1145–1154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2014.08.008

Google Scholar

[7] L. Minier, S. Le Gallet, Y. Grin, F. Bernard, A comparative study of nickel and alumina sintering using spark plasma sintering (SPS), Mater. Chem. Phys. 134 (2012) 243–253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.02.059

Google Scholar

[8] V.M. Kenkre, Theory of microwave interactions witn ceramic materials, Ceram. Trans. 21 (1991).

Google Scholar

[9] M.A. Janney, H.D. Kimrey, M.A. Schmidt, J.O. Kiggans, Grain Growth in Microwave-Annealed Alumina, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 1675–1681.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07159.x

Google Scholar

[10] D. Agrawal, 12 - Microwave sintering of metal powders, in: I. Chang, Y. Zhao (Eds. ), Adv. Powder Metall., Woodhead Publishing, 2013: p.361–379.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Naplocha, K. Granat, Microwave activated combustion synthesis of porous Al–Ti structures for composite reinforcing, J. Alloy. Compd. 486 (2009) 178–184.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.164

Google Scholar

[12] J. Li, Y. Lu, H. Zhang, L. Xin, Effect of grain size and hardness on fretting wear behavior of Inconel 600 alloys, Tribol. Int. 81 (2015) 215–222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.08.005

Google Scholar

[13] C. Slama, G. Cizeron, Étude du comportement structural de l'alliage NC 19 Fe Nb (Inconel 718), J. Phys. III. 7 (1997) 24.

DOI: 10.1051/jp3:1997148

Google Scholar

[14] J. Hidalgo, A. Jiménez-Morales, T. Barriere, J.C. Gelin, J.M. Torralba, Capillary rheology studies of INVAR 36 feedstocks for powder injection moulding, Powder Technol. 273 (2015) 1–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.027

Google Scholar

[15] J.J. Valencia, Sintering effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties of alloy 718 processed by powder injection molding, Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. superalloys 718, 625, 706 and various derivatives (1997).

DOI: 10.7449/1997/superalloys_1997_753_762

Google Scholar

[16] A. García-Junceda, L. Acebo, J.M. Torralba, Study and Suppression of the Microstructural Anisotropy Generated During the Consolidation of a Carbonyl Iron Powder by Field-Assisted Hot Pressing, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 46 (2015) 3192–3198.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-015-2919-z

Google Scholar

[17] J.M. Hill, T.R. Marchant, Modelling microwave heating, Appl. Math. Model. 20 (1996) 3–15.

Google Scholar

[18] Z. Peng, J. -Y. Hwang, Microwave-assisted metallurgy, Int. Mater. Rev. 60 (2014) 30–63.

Google Scholar

[19] G. Roussy, Temperature runaway of microwave heated materials: study and control, J Microw. Power. (1985).

Google Scholar

[20] N.S. Stoloff, Wrought and P/M Superalloys - ASM, ASM Handb. Vol. 1 (1990) 950–980 (31).

Google Scholar