The Present SP Tests for Determining the Transition Temperature TSP on "U" Notch Disc Specimens

Article Preview

Abstract:

The principal difference between the SP testing technique and standardized Impact testing lies in the fact that the SP tests carried out in accordance with CWA 15627 use disc-shaped test specimens without a notch. Especially in tough materials, the temperature dependence of fracture energy in the transition area is ​​very steep and lies close to the temperature of liquid nitrogen. In this case, t he determination of T SP can lead to significant errors in its determination . Efforts to move the transition area of penetration testing closer to the transition area of standardized impact tests led to the proposal of the notched disc specimen 8 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm in thickness with a “U" shaped notch 0.2mm deep in the axis plane of the disc.The paper summarizes the results obtained to date when determining the transition temperature of Small Punch tests, TSP, determined according to CWA 15627 for material of pipes made of P92 and P22 steels in the as delivered state and a heat treated 14MoV6-3 steel. Although the results obtained confirmed the results of other workers in that the presence of a notch in a SP disc is insufficient to increase the transition temperature significantly and certainly not to the values obtained by Charpy testing, comparison of the different behaviours of the alloys tested reveals some evidence that the notch reduces the energy for initiation. This implies that the test on a notched disc is more a test of crack growth and would be a useful instrument if included in the forthcoming EU standard for SP testing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

87-93

Citation:

Online since:

April 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] CEN WORKSHOP AGREEMENT Small Punch Test method for Metallic Materials, CWA 15627: 2007 D/E/F, December (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] HURST, R., MATOCHA, K.: Experiences with the European Code of Practice for Small Punch Testing for Creep, Tensile and Fracture Behaviour. Proceedings of the 3th International Conference SSTT 2014 Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques,. September 23 to 25, 2014, Castle Seggau near Graz, Austria, pp.1-26.

DOI: 10.1520/stp157620140005

Google Scholar

[3] HURST, R.C. and MATOCHA, K.: The European Code of Practice for Small Punch Testing – where do we go from here? Metallurgical Journal Vol. LXIII, 2010. Conference proceedings of the 1st International Conference SSTT "Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques, August 31 to September 2, 2010, pp.5-11.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.734.3

Google Scholar

[4] HURST, R., MATOCHA, K.: Where are we Now with the European Code of Practice for Small Punch Testing? Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference SSTT Determination of Mechanical properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques ,. October 2 to 4, 2012, Ostrava, Czech Rep., pp.4-18.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.734.3

Google Scholar

[5] DYMÁČEK, P., JEČMÍNKA, M.: Applicability of Small Punch Testing Methods for Material Mechanical Properties at Room and High Temperatures. Proceedings of the 3th International Conference SSTT 2014 Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques, September 23 to 25, 2014, Castle Seggau near Graz, Austria, pp.65-74.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.821.435

Google Scholar

[6] HA J.S., FLEURY E. Small punch tests to estimate the mechanical properties of steels for steam power plant: II. Fracture toughness. Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping 1998; 75: 707–13.

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(98)00075-1

Google Scholar

[7] FOULDS J.R. and VISWANATHAN R. Small punch testing for determining the materiál toughness of low alloy components in service J. Of Eng. Materials and technology V. 116 pp.457-464, (1994).

DOI: 10.1115/1.2904313

Google Scholar

[8] MATOCHA K.: Small Punch Testing for Tensile and Fracture Behaviour – Experiences and way Forward. Application of Miniature Small Punch Test Specimen in Determination of Tensile Properties", Small Specimen Test Techniques, 6th International Symposium, ASTM STP1576, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, (2014).

DOI: 10.1520/stp157620140005

Google Scholar

[9] JU J. -B., JANG J., KWON D.: Evaluation of fracture toughness by small-punch testing techniques using sharp notched specimens. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 80 (2003), pp.221-228.

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(03)00042-5

Google Scholar

[10] CUESTA I. I., RODRIGUEZ C., BELZUNCE F. J:, ALEGR J. M.: Analysis of different techniques for obtaining pro-cracked/notched small punch test specimens. Engineering Failure Analysis 18 (2011), pp.2282-2287.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.08.004

Google Scholar

[11] LACALLE R., ÁLVAREZ J. A., CICERO S., GUTIÉRREZ-SOLANA F.: From Archaeology to Precious Metals: Four Applications of Small Punch test. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. SSTT (Small Sample Test Techniques), Vol. 63, p.59–68; 2010, Metallurgical Journal.

DOI: 10.1201/b10564-65

Google Scholar

[12] TURBA K., GŮLCIMEN B., LI Y., BLAGOEVA D., HÄHNER P., HURST R.: Introduction of a new notched specimen geometry to determine fracture properties by small punch testing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Volume 78, Issue 16, November 2011, pp.2826-2833.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.014

Google Scholar

[13] ADAMS, J., BACHE, M.R., HURST R.C. and BORRADAILE, J.B. Ductile-brittle transition characterisation of reactor pressure vessel steels using notched small punch specimens Proceedings of the 3th International Conference SSTT 2014 Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques,. September 23 to 25, 2014, Castle Seggau near Graz, Austria, pp.1-26.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2015-45373

Google Scholar

[14] ADAMS, J. Development of small specimen test techniques for toughness measurement Ph.D. thesis University of Swansea (2015).

Google Scholar

[15] BLAGOEVA D, LI Y. Z, HURST R.C. Qualification of P91 welds through small punch creep testing. J Nucl Mater 2011; 409: 124–30.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.015

Google Scholar