Dynamic Tensile Testing of High Strength Armor Steel Plates

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper was studied dynamic behavior of the armor steels Armox 500T and Secure 500 by testing specimens in quasi-static tensile test with strain rate 1∙10-3 s-1 and high-speed tensile test within range of intermediate strain rates from 100 s-1 to 400s-1 at the room temperature. Hardness test and quasi-static tensile test confirmed material properties specified by the manufacturer. Stress-strain diagrams showed very low strain-rate hardening effect at investigated strain rates. Total elongation at fracture was larger in case of Armox 500T for the whole strain rate range. Deformation energy density was calculated from the stress-strain curve and temperature rise due to adiabatic heating was estimated. Because of higher total elongation, Armox 500T was able to withstand higher deformation energy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

70-75

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ji-Hoon Kim, Daeyong Kim, Heung Nam Han, F. Barlat, Myoung-Gyu Lee, Strain rate dependent tensile behavior of advanced high strength steels: Experiment and constitutive modeling, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 559, 1 January 2013, pp.222-231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.087

Google Scholar

[2] Woei-Shyan Lee, Chen-Yang Liu, The effects of temperature and strain rate on the dynamic flow behaviour of different steels, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 426, Issues 1–2, 25 June 2006, pp.101-113.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.087

Google Scholar

[3] M. N. Bassim, Study of the formation of adiabatic shear bands in steels, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 119 (2001), p.234–236.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00952-9

Google Scholar

[4] H. Nahme, E. Lach. Dynamic Behavior of High Strength Armor Steels. Journal de Physique IV Colloque, 1997, 07 (C3), pp. C3-373-C3-378.

DOI: 10.1051/jp4:1997365

Google Scholar

[5] M.A. Iqbal, K. Senthil, P. Sharma, N.K. Gupta, An investigation of the constitutive behavior of Armox 500T steel and armor piercing incendiary projectile material, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Volume 96, October 2016, Pages 146-164.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.017

Google Scholar

[6] M. Nilsson. Constitutive Model for Armox 500T and Armox 600T at. Low and Medium Strain Rates, December 2003. ISSN 1650-1942. Technical report.

Google Scholar

[7] Sven Robert Raisch, Bernhard Möginger, High rate tensile tests – Measuring equipment and evaluation, Polymer Testing, Volume 29, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 265-272.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.010

Google Scholar

[8] Xinran Xiao, Dynamic tensile testing of plastic materials, Polymer Testing, Volume 27, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 164-178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.010

Google Scholar

[9] Fei Feng, Shangyu Huang, Zhenghua Meng, Jianhua Hu, Yu Lei, Mengcheng Zhou, Dan Wu, Zhenzhen Yang, Experimental study on tensile property of AZ31B magnesium alloy at different high strain rates and temperatures, Materials & Design, Volume 57, May 2014, Pages 10-20.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.031

Google Scholar

[10] B.L. Boyce, M.F. Dilmore, The dynamic tensile behavior of tough, ultrahigh-strength steels at strain-rates from 0. 0002 s−1 to 200 s−1, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Volume 36, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 263-271.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.006

Google Scholar