Multi-Objective Optimization in Electrical Discharge Machining of 6061 Al/SiCp Using RSM and NSGA-II

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, response surface methodology (RSM) and non sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) are used to optimize the multi-responses of electrical discharge machining of Aluminum Alloy 6061/10%SiCp composite. Experiment is performed to evaluates the effects of process parameters namely peak current, pulse on time, pulses off time and gap voltage on the responses material removal rate (MRR) and tool wear rate (TWR). The central composite rotatable design (CCRD) is utilized to design the experiment using RSM. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test is performed to validate model and to further establish the mathematical relation between process parameters and responses. Results are analyzed using ANOVA models. NSGA-II is used to optimize two conflicting responses i.e MRR and TWR. Finally results are validated by confirmatory experiment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

207-211

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.C. Pandey and H.S. Shan H.S., Modern Machining Processes", Tata McGraw Hill India, (2008) 84-113.

Google Scholar

[2] B.J. Ranganath, Thermal Metal Cutting Processes, IK International Publishing House Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, (2008) 4-19.

Google Scholar

[3] M.K. Surappa, Aluminium matrix composites: Challenges and Opportunities, Sadhana, vol. 28 ( 1 & 2), (2003) 319-334.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02717141

Google Scholar

[4] N. Tomac N. and K. Tonnessen, Machinability of particulate aluminum matrix composites, Annal CIRP, 42(1), 55-58.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Manna and B. Bhattacharya B., A study on different tooling system during machining of Al/SiC-MMC, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 123 (2000) 476-482.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00127-9

Google Scholar

[6] N. Singh, K. Raghukandan, M. Rathinasabapathi and B.C. Pai, Electric discharge machining of Al–10%SiCP as-cast metal matrix composites, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, (2004) 155–156 and 1653–1657.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.321

Google Scholar

[7] R.K. Bhushan, S. Kumar and S. Das, GA approach for optimization of surface roughness parameters in machining of Al alloy SiC particle composite, JMEPEG, vol. 21, pp.1676-1686, (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-011-0066-2

Google Scholar

[8] P.K. Shrivastava and A.K. Dubey, (2013), Intelligent modeling and multi-objective optimization of electric discharge diamond grinding, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 28, (2013) 1036-104.

Google Scholar

[9] M.P. Garg, A. Jain and G. Bhushan, Modelling and multi-objective optimization of process parameters of wire electrical discharge machining using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, Proc IMechE Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 226(12), (2012).

DOI: 10.1177/0954405412462778

Google Scholar

[10] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th edition; Wiley India: New Delhi, (2010).

Google Scholar

[11] N. Srinivas and D. Kalyanmoy, Multiobjective Optimization using Non-dominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms, Journal Evolutionary Computation, 2(3), (1994) 221-248.

DOI: 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221

Google Scholar

[12] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2), (2002) 182-19.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar