Aspects of the Structure and Corrosion Resistance of Materials Used in Tongue Piercings

Article Preview

Abstract:

For centuries, piercing was an expression of art around the world and constituted a significant part of the culture and rituals of many different civilizations. This study evaluated the microstructure and the corrosion resistance in artificial saliva of two newly implantable devices used in tongue piercing. We investigated materials microstructure by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), followed by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis in order to determine elemental composition. The corrosion resistance was determined by linear polarization technique. The corrosion tests were performed in artificial saliva Fusayama Meyer (composition: 0.4 gl-1NaCl, 0.9 gl-1 KCl, 1 gl-1 urea, 0.69 gl-1 NaH2PO4, 0.795 gl-1 CaCl * 2H2O) with a pH = 5.2 at temperature of 37 ± 0.5°C. The materials used for these types of implants were identified as Ti-6Al-4V alloy (sample 1) and austenitic stainless steel (sample 2). From corrosion resistance evaluation point of view, sample 1 showed the most electropositive value and hence better corrosion behavior compared to sample 2, having the Ecor potential -398.24 mV but this is clearly according the chemical composition of these two metallic biomaterials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

80-84

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.L. Armstrong, E. Ekmark, B. Brooks, Body piercing: promoting informed decision making. J Sch Nurs 112 (1995) 20-25.

Google Scholar

[2] M.L. Armstrong, You pierced what? Ped Nurs, 22 (1996) 236-238.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Rabinerson, E. Horowitz, Genital piercing. Harefuah, 144 (2005) 736-738.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Beers, J. Meires, L. Loriz, Body piercing. The Nurse Practitioner 32(2) (2007) 60, 269-306.

DOI: 10.1097/00006205-200702000-00011

Google Scholar

[5] M.L. Armstrong, J.R. Koch, J.C. Saunders, A.E. Roberts, D.C. Owen, The whole picture: risks, decision making, purpose, regulations, and the future of body piercing, Clin Dermatol, Jul-Aug, 25(4) (2007) 398-406.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.05.019

Google Scholar

[6] M.L. Armstrong, A.E. Roberts, D. Owen, et al, Toward building a composite of college student influences with body art. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 27 (2004) 277-295.

DOI: 10.1080/01460860490884183

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Gold, C.M. Schorzman, P.J. Murray et al, Body piercing practices and attitudes among urban adolescents. J Adolesc Health 36 (2005) 352 - 415.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.012

Google Scholar

[8] A.E. Laumann, A.J. Derick, Tattoos and body piercing in the United States: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol 55 (2006) 413-421.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.03.026

Google Scholar

[9] A. Bors, I. Antoniac, C. Cotrut, A. Antoniac, M. Szekely, Surface Analysis of Contemporary Aesthetic Dental Filling Materials after Storage in Erosive Solutions, Materiale Plastice, Volume 53, No. 4, (2016) 607- 611.

Google Scholar

[10] I. Antoniac, M.D. Vranceanu, A. Antoniac, The influence of the magnesium powder used as reinforcement material on the properties of some collagen based composite biomaterials, Journals of optoelectronic and advanced materials, Volume 15, Issue 7-8, (2013).

Google Scholar

[11] H. Manolea, I. Antoniac, M. Miculescu, R. Rica, A. Platon, R. Melnicenco Variability of the composite resins adhesion with the dental substrate preparation and the used adhesive type, Journal of adhesion science and technology, Volume 30, Issue 16, (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2015.1091676

Google Scholar

[12] M.L. Armstrong, A.E. Roberts, J.R. Koch, et al, Investigating the removal of body piercings. Clin Nurs Res 16 (2007), 103-118.

DOI: 10.1177/1054773806298506

Google Scholar

[13] T. Makkai, I. McAllister, Prevalence of tattooing and body piercing in the Australian communit, Commun Dis Intell 25 (2001), 67-72.

Google Scholar

[14] S.S. Price, M.W. Lewis, Body piercing involving oral sites, J Am Dent Assoc. 128 (1997), 1017–1020.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Boardman, R.A. Smith, Dental implications of oral piercing, Oral Health 87 (1997), 23–31.

Google Scholar

[16] C.S. Farah, D.M. Harmon, Tongue piercing: case report and review of current practice, Aust Dent J. 43 (1998), 387–389.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00197.x

Google Scholar

[17] M.J. Fehrenbach, Tongue piercing and potential oral complications, J Dent Hyg. 72 (1998), 23–25.

Google Scholar

[18] B.J. Folz, B.M. Lippert, C. Kuelkens, J.A. Werner, Hazards of piercing and facial body art: a report of three patients and literature review, Ann Plast. Surg. 45 (2000), 374–381.

DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200045040-00004

Google Scholar

[19] A. Campbell, A. Moore, E. Williams, J. Stephens, D.N. Tatakis, Tongue piercing: Impact of time and barbell stem length on lingual gingival recession and tooth chipping, J Periodontol. 73 (2002), 289–297.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.289

Google Scholar

[20] D. Ziebolz, E. Hornecker, R.F. Mausberg, Microbiological findings at tongue piercing sites: Implications to oral health, Int J Dent Hyg, 7 (2009), 256–262.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2009.00369.x

Google Scholar