Algorithms for Clinical Indications of Bone Substitutes - Component of Training in Orthopaedic Surgery

Mihail Nagea; Olivera Lupescu; Gheorghe Ion Popescu; Iulian Antoniac

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.758.217

Paper Titles

Preparation and Characterization of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Powders with High Solubility for Chelate-Setting Calcium-Phosphate Cements
p.194

Synthesis and Characterization of Biomimetic Strontium Substituted Carbonated Calcium-Deficient Hydroxyapatite Deposited on Carbon Fiber Cloths
p.199

Thermokinetic Investigation of the Drying Conditions on Amorphous Calcium Phosphate
p.204

Vapour Diffusion Route to Mineralize Graphene and Polymer Surfaces with Calcium Phosphate Intended for Biomedical Applications
p.210

Algorithms for Clinical Indications of Bone Substitutes - Component of Training in Orthopaedic Surgery
p.217

Effect of Octacalcium Phosphate-Based Bone Substitute Materials on Oriented Bone Regeneration
p.223

Ceramic Roles in Aseptic Loosening: In Vivo Macro- and Microscopic Histological Evaluation
p.228

Cementing Technique for THA Sockets Using Bone Cement and HA Granules: Modified-IBBC
p.234

Effect of a Rapidly Resorbable Calcium Alkali Phosphate Bone Grafting Material on Osteogenesis after Sinus Floor Augmentation in Humans
p.239

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 758Algorithms for Clinical Indications of Bone...

Algorithms for Clinical Indications of Bone Substitutes - Component of Training in Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:

Modern traumatology is characterised by increasingly severe injuries, with significant soft tissue and bone loss; therefore, restoration of functional anatomy regards bone filling with proper bone integration, and otherwise surgical reconstruction is useless. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons must have not only surgical skills, but thorough knowledge about the properties and indications of bone substitutes, which can improve surgical results in treating especially comminuted fractures. Integrating the clinical experience from a Level 1 Trauma Centre with didactic principles, and using e-learning as an educational tool, this paper refers to establishing an algorithm of clinical indications of bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery and to introducing it into the educational process of orthopaedic trainees, as a component of vocational training.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 758)

Pages:

217-222

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.758.217

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2017

Authors:

Mihail Nagea, Olivera Lupescu*, Gheorghe Ion Popescu, Iulian Antoniac

Keywords:

Bioceramics, Bone Healing, Bone Substitute, Diamond Concept, Vocational Training

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] PV Giannoudis, TA Einhorn, D Marsh, Fracture healing- the diamond concept, Injury. 38 (2007) (Suppl. 4): S3–6.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(08)70003-2

Google Scholar

[2] GM Calori, PV Giannoudis, et al, Enhancement of fracture healing with the diamond concept: The role of the biological chamber, Injury. 42(2014) 1191 - 1193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.016

Google Scholar

[3] T Kurien, RG Pearson, Bone graft substitutes currently available in orthopaedic practice; the evidence for their use, Bone Joint J. 95-B (2013) 583–97.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b5.30286

Google Scholar

[4] PV Giannoudis PV et al, What should be the characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute? , Injury, 42 ( 2011) Suppl 2 , S1–S12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.001

Google Scholar

[5] SN Khan, FP Cammisa, HS Sandhu, AD Diwan , FP Girardi , JM Lane, The biology of bone grafting, J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 13 ( 2005) 77-86.

DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200501000-00010

Google Scholar

[6] L Drago, E De Vecchi, M Bortolin, M Toscano, R Mattina, CL Romanò, Antimicrobial activity and resistance selection of different bioglass S53P4 formulations against multidrug resistant strains, Future Microbiol. 10 (8) (2015) 1293-9.

DOI: 10.2217/fmb.15.57

Google Scholar

[7] CL Romanò, N Logoluso, E Meani, D Romanò, E De Vecchi, C Vassena, L Drago, A comparative study of the use of bioactive glass S53P4 and antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis - a retrospective comparative study, Bone Joint J. 96-B (2014).

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.96b6.33014

Google Scholar

[8] D Zhang, E Munukka, L Hupa, H Ylänen, MK Viljanen, M Hupa, Factors controlling antibacterial properties of bioactive glasses, Key Engineering Materials. (2007) 173-176.

Google Scholar

[9] JV. Rau, I Antoniac, G Cama, VS Komlev, A Ravaglioli, Bioactive Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering, BioMed Research International. vol. 2016, Article ID 3741428 doi: 10. 1155/2016/3741428.

DOI: 10.1155/2016/3741428

Google Scholar

[10] V. Campana, G. Milano, E. Pagano et al., Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 25( 2014) 2445–2461.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2

Google Scholar