In Vitro Resorbability of 3D Printed Hydroxyapatite in Two Different pH Buffered Solutions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Resorability of 3D printed hydroxyapatite (3DP HA) in deionized water solution which was buffered with succinic acid-NaOH (pH 5.5) and Tris(hydroxymethyl aminomethane) (pH 7.4) for 1, 7, 14 and 28 days was carried out. Weight change and release of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were used to evaluate the sample resorption. It was found that the weight of samples soaking in both pH 5.5 and 7.4 solutions decreased with increasing soaking times, but the degree of decrease was greater at pH 5.5 than at pH 7.4. ICP-OES results showed that the release of Ca and P in both pH solutions increased with immersing times. The amount of Ca and P released at pH 5.5 was higher than at pH 7.4. Phase composition of the samples and the microstructure of the sample were characterized using XRD and SEM respectively. XRD analysis showed that hydroxyapatite (HA) and octacalcium phosphate (OCP) phases were found at the center of all samples, but the intensity of OCP peaks tended to decrease with increasing times. Only HA was found on the sample surface after immersion in both pH solutions at all soaking periods. After immersion, newly formed crystals were seen both at the center and/or on the surface of samples. These results suggested that pH could influence the resorption of the samples and also the formation of new calcium phosphate crystals.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

71-76

Citation:

Online since:

April 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Wang, X. Yang, Z. Gu, H.Qin, L. Li, J. Liu and X. Yu, In vitro study on the degradation of lithium-doped hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering scaffold, Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater., 66 (2016) 185-192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.065

Google Scholar

[2] J. Suwanprateeb, F. Thammarakcharoen, K. wasoontararat and W. Suvannapruk, Influence of printing parameters on the transformation efficiency of 3D-printed plaster of paris to hydroxyapatite and its properties, Rapid Prototyping J., 18 (2012) 490-499.

DOI: 10.1108/13552541211272036

Google Scholar

[3] F. Thammarakcharoen, P. Palanuraksa and J. Suwanprateeb, In vitro resorbability of three different processed hydroxyapatite, Key Eng. Mater., 659 (2015) 3-7.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.659.3

Google Scholar

[4] W. Wang and K.W.K. Yeung, Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review, Bioact. Mater., 2 (2017) 224-247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007

Google Scholar

[5] M. Cicuéndez, J. Doadrio, Ana Hernández, M.T. Portolés and I. Izquierdo-Barba, Multifunctional pH sensitive 3D scaffolds for treatment and prevention of bone infection, Acta. Biomater., 65 (2018) 450-461.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.009

Google Scholar

[6] L.R. Bennison, C.N. Miller, R.J. Summers, A.M.B. Minnis,G. Sussman and W. McGuiness, The pH wounds during healing and infection: A descriptive literature review, Wound Pract. Res., 25 (2017) 63-69.

Google Scholar

[7] B.S. Nagoba, N.M. Suryawanshi, Acidic environment and wound healing: A review, Wounds., 27 (2015) 5-11.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Daculsi, O. Laboux, O. Malard, P. Weiss, Current state of the art of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 14 (2003) 195-200.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Yokoi, H. kato, I.Y. Kim and K. Kikuta, Synthesis of octacalcium phosphate with incorporated succinate and suberate ions, Ceram. Inter., 38 (2012) 3815-3820.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.030

Google Scholar

[10] N. Ito, M. Kamitakahara, M. Yoshimura and K. Ioku, Importance of nucleation in transformation of octacalcium phosphate to hydroxyapatite, Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater., 40 (2014) 121-126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.03.034

Google Scholar