Fabrication and Characterization of Porous Bioceramic Made from Bovine Bone Powder Mixed Calcium Phosphate Glass

Sittiporn Punyanitya; Sakdiphon Thiansem; Anirut Raksujarit; Phanlob Chankachang; Tiwasawat Sirisoam; Rungsarit Koonawoot

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.803.187

Paper Titles

Influence of Third Element of TiNi Alloy on Tribological Behavior in Dry and Wet Conditions for Orthodontic Applications
p.167

Preparation of pH-Responsive Nanoparticles (PRNPs) for Detection of Pathogenic Escherichia coli from Stool Sample of Diarrheagenic Patients
p.172

Compressive Property and Electrochemistry Behavior of Porous Ti-Nb-Ta-Zr for Biomedical Applications
p.178

Water Adsorption Properties of Titanium(IV) Oxide Embedded in Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes (CNT)
p.182

Fabrication and Characterization of Porous Bioceramic Made from Bovine Bone Powder Mixed Calcium Phosphate Glass
p.187

Behavior of Timber-Steel Composite with Dowel Connection under Fire
p.195

Experimental Investigation on Strength and Bearing Capacity Improvement of a High Plasticity Clayey Subgrade Soil Using Lime
p.200

Durability Studies of Environmental Friendly Self Compacting Concrete with and without Fiber
p.207

Study on Strength Characteristics Improvement of Polyethylene Modified Bituminous Concrete Mixes
p.216

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 803Fabrication and Characterization of Porous...

Fabrication and Characterization of Porous Bioceramic Made from Bovine Bone Powder Mixed Calcium Phosphate Glass

Abstract:

Bovine bone xenograft was selected bioactive material currently widespread acceptable for using as human bone void filler. In this paper we described a new porous bioceramic block fabricated from bovine bone powders mixed with calcium phosphate glass. The characterized methods were atomic absorption spectrometer, x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, energy dispersion x-ray spectroscopy, diffusion test, bending test, compressive test and Archimedes’ principle. The final products showed interconnecting pores size range 100 to 500 mm, apparent porosity about 52% and mole ratio of Ca:P as 1.65. The toxic elements such as arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead were lower standard limits of ASTM I (American Society for Testing and Materials International). The samples had a compressive strength more than 400 kg/cm². So, this object can be useful as an alternative choice for human bone substitute in the vertical compression load bearing area.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 803)

Pages:

187-191

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.803.187

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2019

Authors:

Sittiporn Punyanitya*, Sakdiphon Thiansem, Anirut Raksujarit, Phanlob Chankachang, Tiwasawat Sirisoam, Rungsarit Koonawoot

Keywords:

Bioactive Material, Bioceramic, Bone Substitute, Bovine, Hydroxyapatite, Xenograft

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] J.M. Toth, H.S. An, Bone graft and substitutes, biomaterials and osteoconductive substances in spinal instrumentation, in: An HS, Cotler J.M. (Eds.), Spinal instrumentation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott William&Wilkins, 1999, pp.73-84.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Joschek, B. Nies, R. Krotz and A. Gopferich: Biomaterials Vol. 21 (2000), pp.1645-1658.

Google Scholar

[3] S.J. Kalita, S. Bose, H.L. Hosick: Biomaterials Vol. 25 (2004), pp.2331-2339.

Google Scholar

[4] C.Y. Ooi, M. Hamdi and S. Ramesh: Ceram.Int. Vol. 33 (2007), pp.1171-1177.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Sasikumar and R. Vijayaraghavan: Biomater.Artif.Organs. Vol. 19 (2006), pp.70-76.

Google Scholar

[6] U. Heise, J. F. Osborn and F. Duwe: Inter. Ortho. Vol. 14 (1990), pp.329-338.

Google Scholar

[7] ASTM F1185-03: standard specification for composition of hydroxyapatite for surgical implants, (2014).

Google Scholar

[8] ASTM C373-88 (Reapproved 2006): standard Test Method for Water Absorption, Bulk Density, Apparent Porosity, and Apparent Specific Gravity of Fired Whiteware Products1, (2009).

DOI: 10.1520/c0373-14

Google Scholar

[9] J.A. Juhasz, S.M. Best, R. Brooks, M. Kawashita, N. Miyata, T. Kokubo, T. Nakamura and W. Bonfield: Biomaterials Vol. 25 (2004), pp.949-955.

Google Scholar

[10] R.H. Wittenberg, J. Moeller, M. Shea, A.A. 3rd White and W.C. Hayes: Spine Vol. 15(10) (1990), pp.1073-1078.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Callut and J.C. Knowles: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. Vol. 13 (2000), pp.485-489.

Google Scholar

[12] F.H. Albee and H.F. Morrison: Ann. Surg. Vol. 71 (1920), pp.32-39.

Google Scholar

[13] E.B. Nery, K.L. Lynch, W.M. Hirthe and K.H. Mueller: Periodontol Vol. 46(6) (1975), pp.328-347.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Goller, D. Hande, F.N. Oktar and D. Erdem: Ceram. Intern. Vol. 29 (2003), pp.21-24.

Google Scholar

[15] M.H. Prado da Silva, A.F. Lemos, J.M.F. Ferreira and J.D. Santos: Mat. Res. Vol. 6 (2003), pp.321-325.

Google Scholar