Potential Activity Evaluation of Phosphorus on CoMo/Al₂O₃-TiO₂ Catalysts to Co-Processing Model

Abstract:

The Co-Processing Model consist of the hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of guaiacol compound was represented of bio-oil model and the hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of quinolone compound was represented petroleum model, were investigated in tetralin at 300 °C under pressure of hydrogen 50 bar with the CoMoP sulfided supported on Al₂O₃-TiO₂ catalyst and without phosphorus (P), the potential activity evaluation was compared with commercial catalysts. The liquid products after reaction were characterized by GC/MS. The CMAT, 0.5PCMAT and 1PCMAT catalysts proved to be effective for hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol leading to significantly increased percentage of HDO, there are presence the %HDO as 57.93, 58.33 and 58.94 respectively, whereas the commercial catalysts showed the % HDO in range as 28-30%, while 2PCMAT catalysts showed the activity was less in HDO of guaiacol than other synthesized catalysts but showed high activity more than the commercial catalysts. Additionally, the HDN activity of CMAT catalyst showed that were improved, especially the phosphorus adding to CMAT present were high activity, due to the effects of the phosphorus as the catalyst promoter result to change of their morphologies and increase in Mo dispersion and increase in stacking of MoS₂ crystallites, involve the formation of new acid sites on the catalyst surface.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 841)
• Pages: 278-282
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.841.278
• Online since: May 2020
• Authors: Thirada Rodseanglung*, Jitracha Paksamut
• Keywords: Co-Processing Model, Guaiacol, Mix-Oxide Supported, Phosphorus Effect, Quinoline

References

[1] B. P. Pattanaik, R. D. Misra, Effect of reaction pathway and operating parameters on the deoxygenation of vegetable oils to produce diesel range hydrocarbon fuels: A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 73 (2017) 545-557.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.018

[2] C. Wang, M. Li, Y. Fang, Coprocessing of Catalytic-Pyrolysis-Derived Bio-Oil with VGO in a Pilot-Scale FCC Riser, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(12) 2016 3525-3534.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03008

[3] H. Mizutani, H. Godo, T. Ohsaki, Y. Kato, T. Fujikawa, Y. Saih, T. Funamoto, K. Segawa, Inhibition effect of nitrogen compounds on CoMoP/Al2O3 catalysts with alkali or zeolite added in hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene and 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene, Appl. Catalysis A: General. 295(2) (2005) 193-200.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.08.017

[4] T. Rodseanglung, T. Ratana, M. Phongaksorn, S. Tungkamania, Biofuel Production from Jatropha Bio-Oil Derived Fast Pyrolysis: Effect and Mechanism of CoMoS Supported on Al2O3, Mater. Sci. Eng. 137 (2018).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/317/1/012064

[5] E. Rodríguez-Castellón, A. Jiménez-López, D. Eliche-Quesada, Nickel and Cobalt promoted tungsten and molybdenum sulfide mesoporous catalysts for hydrodesulfurization, Fuel, 87(7) (2008) 1195-1206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.07.020

[6] Y. Yang, A. Gilbert, C. Xu, Hydrodeoxygenation of bio-crude in supercritical hexane with sulfided CoMo and CoMoP catalysts supported on MgO: A model compound study using phenol, Appl. Catalysis A: General. 360(2) (2009) 242-249.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.03.027

[7] V. N. Bui, D. Laurenti, P. Afanasiev, C. Geantet, Hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol with CoMo catalysts. Part I: Promoting effect of cobalt on HDO selectivity and activity, Appl. Catalysis B: Environ. 101(3-4) (2011) 239-245.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.10.025

[8] T. Rodseanglung, T. Ratana, M. Phongaksorn, S. Tungkamania, Effect of TiO2 Incorporated with Al2O3 on the Hydrodeoxygenation and Hydrodenitrogenation CoMo Sulfide Catalysts, Energy Procedia, 79 (2015) 378-384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.506

[9] M. Bachrach, N. Morlanes-Sanchez, C. P. Canlas, J. T. Miller, T. J. Marks, J. M. Notestein, Increasing the Aromatic Selectivity of Quinoline Hydrogenolysis Using Pd/MOx–Al2O3, Catal. Lett. 144(11) 2014 1832-1838.

DOI: 10.1007/s10562-014-1346-x