Development of a CuFe2O4 - Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Malathion

Article Preview

Abstract:

A portable non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor for malathion detection based on CuFe2O4 and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites was developed. CuFe2O4-rGO nanocomposites were synthesized using a facile one-pot co-precipitation method. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy confirmed successful synthesis of the nanocomposites. Square wave voltammetry was performed using a portable potentiostat (CheapStat) and a three-electrode setup in order to determine the electrochemical behavior of the nanocomposite and its interaction with malathion. Maximum inhibition was observed at conditions corresponding to 15% rGO loading, pH 4 buffer solution, and five-minute accumulation time. Calibration of the sensor established a linear detection range of 0.5-8 ppm and a detection limit of 0.992 ± 0.007 ppm. Altogether, the performance parameters indicate good selectivity and potential applicability of the system for malathion monitoring particularly in agricultural products.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

41-47

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Hsu, et al. Uncovering malathion (an organophosphate insecticide) action on Ca+ signal transduction and investigating the effects of BAPTA-AM (a cell permeant Ca2+ chelator) on protective responses in glial cells, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol, 157 (2019) 152-160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.03.015

Google Scholar

[2] J. Lu, et al. Treat of pesticide exposure and related cases in the Philippines, J. Rural Med. 5(2) (2010) 153–64.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Bala, et al. Ultrasensitive aptamer biosensor for malathion detection based on cationic polymer and gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron, 85 (2016) 445–449.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.042

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Xie, et al. CuO nanoparticles decorated 3D graphene nanocomposite as non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing platform for malathion detection, J. Electroanal. Chem. 812 (2018) 82–89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.01.043

Google Scholar

[5] D. Huo, et al. A highly efficient organophosphorus pesticide sensor based on CuO nanowires-SWCNT hybrid nanocomposite, Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 199 (2014) 410-417.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.04.016

Google Scholar

[6] A. A. Rowe, et al. CheapStat: An Open-Source, Do-It-Yourself, Potentiostat for Analytical and Educational Applications, PLoS ONE 6(9) (2011) e23783.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023783

Google Scholar

[7] R. Dhanda and M. Kidwai, Magnetically separable CuFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites: as a highly selective catalyst for solvent free oxidative coupling of amines to imines, RSC Adv. 6(58) (2016) 53430-53437.

DOI: 10.1039/c6ra08868f

Google Scholar

[8] M. Chandel, et al. Synthesis of multifunctional CuFe2O4–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite: an efficient magnetically separable catalyst as well as high performance supercapacitor and first-principles calculations of its electronic structures, RSC Adv. 8(49) (2018) 27725-27739.

DOI: 10.1039/c8ra05393f

Google Scholar

[9] L. Achary, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-CuFe2O4 nanocomposite: A highly sensitive room temperature NH3 gas sensor, Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 272 (2018) 100–109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.093

Google Scholar

[10] S. Rouhani, et al. Graphene oxide/CuFe2O4 nanocomposite as a novel scaffold for the immobilization of laccase and its application as a recyclable nanobiocatalyst for the green synthesis of arylsulfonyl benzenediols, Biochem. Eng. J. 133 (2018) 1–11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.01.004

Google Scholar

[11] M. Huang, et al. Electrochemical nonenzymatic sensor based on CoO decorated reduced graphene oxide for the simultaneous determination of carbofuran and carbaryl in fruits and vegetables, Food Chem. 151 (2014) 191-197.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.046

Google Scholar

[12] P. Camargo, K. Satyanarayana, and F. Wypych, Nanocomposites: synthesis, structure, properties and new application opportunities. Mat. Res. 12(1) (2009) 1-39.

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392009000100002

Google Scholar

[13] G. Bolat and S. Abaci, Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Sensing of Malathion Pesticide in Tomato and Apple Samples Based on Gold Nanoparticles-Chitosan-Ionic Liquid Hybrid Nanocomposite. Sens. 18(3) (2018) 773.

DOI: 10.3390/s18030773

Google Scholar

[14] DENR, Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent Standards of 2016. DENR Administrative Order 2016-08. (2016).

Google Scholar