Influence of Casting Method on Pervaporational Performanses of Polyheptylmethylsiloxane Membranes

Article Preview

Abstract:

A method of composite membrane obtaining effects on its transport properties. In the present work, for the first time, the influence of the method of applying a selective layer of polyheptylmethylsiloxane on the composite membrane pervaporation properties in the process of alcohol separation from water was studied. The comparison of two casting methods (kiss-coating and spin-coating) was conducted. Morphology of the obtained membranes and their separation properties during the pervaporation of the mixture of C2-C4 alcohols and water. It was shown that kiss-coating allows completely prevent leakage of the selective layer into the substrate pores. And, such a way, it allows to improve permeability of composite membrane (BuOH - 3.5 mol/(kPa·h·m2)). Besides, spin-coating method leads to higher selectivity (BuOH/H2O - 2.3). It is caused by blocking the swelling of that part of the selective layer that is locked in the pores of the substrate. Thus, the choice of the casting method can determine the compatibility of the composite membrane with a specific separation task.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

51-55

Citation:

Online since:

October 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L.M. Vane, A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes, J. Chem. Tech. Biotech. 80 (2005) 603-629.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1265

Google Scholar

[2] I.L. Borisov, A. Kujawska, K. Knozowska, V.V. Volkov, W. Kujawski, Influence of feed flow rate, temperature and feed concentration on concentration polarization effects during separation of water-methyl acetate solutions with high permeable hydrophobic pervaporation PDMS membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 564 (2018) 1-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.001

Google Scholar

[3] P. Shao, R.Y.M. Huang, Polymeric membrane pervaporation, J. Membr. Sci. 287 (2007) 162-179.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Rozicka, J. Niemisto, R.L. Keiski, W. Kujawski Apparent and intrinsic properties of commercial PDMS based membranes in pervaporative removal of acetone, butanol and ethanol from binary aqueous mixtures, J. Membr. Sci. 453 (2014) 108-118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.065

Google Scholar

[5] W. Van Hecke, H. De Wever, High-flux POMS organophilic pervaporation for ABE recovery applied in fed-batch and continuous set-ups, J. Membr. Sci. 540 (2017) 321-332.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.058

Google Scholar

[6] I.F.J. Vankelecom, D. Depre, S. De Beukelaer, J.B. Uytterhoeven, Influence of zeolites in PDMS membranes: pervaporation of water/alcohol mixtures, J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 13193-13197.

DOI: 10.1021/j100035a024

Google Scholar

[7] E.A. Grushevenko, I.A. Podtynnikov, G.S. Golubev, V.V. Volkov, I.L. Borisov, Polyheptylmethylsiloxane – a novel material for removal of oxygenates from water by pervaporation, Petr. Chem. 58 (2018) 941-948.

DOI: 10.1134/s0965544118110026

Google Scholar

[8] E.A. Grushevenko, I.L. Borisov, D.S. Bakhtin, S.A. Legkov, G.N. Bondarenko, A.V. Volkov, Membrane material based on octyl-substituted polymethylsiloxane for separation of C3/C1 hydrocarbons, Petr. Chem. 7 (2017) 117-124.

DOI: 10.1134/s0965544117040028

Google Scholar

[9] E.A. Grushevenko, I.L. Borisov, A.A. Knyazeva, V.V. Volkov, A.V. Volkov, Polyalkylmethylsiloxanes composite membranes for hydrocarbon/methane separation: Eight component mixed-gas permeation properties, Sep. Pur. Technol. 241 (2020) 116696.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116696

Google Scholar

[10] I. Borisov, D. Bakhtin, J.M. Luque-Alled, A. Rybakova, V. Makarova, A.B. Foster, W.J. Harrison, V. Volkov, V. Polevaya, P. Gorgojo, E. Prestat, P.M. Budd, A. Volkov, Synergistic enhancement of gas selectivity in thin film composite membranes of PIM-1, J. Mater. Chem. A. 7 (2019) 6417-6430.

DOI: 10.1039/c8ta10691f

Google Scholar