Effect of Different Tool Geometries on the Mechanical Properties of Al-Al Clinch Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

The use of clinch joints, e.g. vehicle structures, is determined by the reliability of the joint and its strength properties - in particular the fatigue strength. Clinch connections offer the advantage over form-closure and force-closure processes that they can also be used for hybrid material combinations. In order to be able to evaluate the influence of the geometry parameters such as e.g. undercut, neck thickness or also base thickness on the fatigue behavior, three clinch connections (in optimum and compromise design) with different tool parameters were designed and examined using the example of a joining task with aluminum sheet material. For this purpose, fatigue curves (F-N curves) in the range of high to very high numbers of load cycles (N = 105 to 107) were determined. In this load cycle range, a so-called "neck fracture" is mainly to be expected as the type of failure, whereas for quasi-static tests, a “buckling” is more likely to occur. The tests were carried out on single-cut overlapping shear tensile specimens. Metallographic and scanning electron microscopic examinations of the joints and the fracture surfaces served to identify the crack initiation site and to clarify the respective type of failure. Significant differences in the damage behaviour of the three clinching variants could be shown. This observation enables one step into the direction of fully understanding the relationship along the causal chain "joint requirements - joining process - fatigue strength". Thus the adaptability of the clinching process can be improved.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

65-72

Citation:

Online since:

April 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis): Nachhaltige Entwicklung in Deutschland, 2018, S. 98.

Google Scholar

[2] Feldmann, K.; Schöppner, V.; Spur, G. (a cura di): Handbuch Fügen, Handhaben, Montieren, Hanser, München, 2014 (2. Auflage).

DOI: 10.3139/9783446436565.fm

Google Scholar

[3] Tölle, J.; Schmidt, H.; Hahn, O.; Hanselka, H.: Entwicklung einer Methode zur vgl. Bewertung von Schwingfestigkeitsversuchen mit gefügten Stahlblechen in Abhängigkeit des Versagensverhaltens. FAT-Schriftenreihe 221, VDA Verlag, Berlin, (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] Reich, M.; Osten, J.; Milkereit, B.; Kalich, J.; Füssel, U.; Kessler, O.: Short-time heat treat-ment of press hardened steel for laser-assisted clinching, Materials Science and Technology, 30 (2014) 11, S. 1287-1296,.

DOI: 10.1179/1743284714y.0000000556

Google Scholar

[5] Füssel, U., Kalich, J., Grossmann, St., Schlegel, St., Ramonat, A.: Optimierung umformtechnischer Fügeverfahren zur Kontaktierung elektrischer Leiter, EFB Forschungsbericht Nr. 506, ISBN-13: 978-3867765596, Hannover (2019).

Google Scholar

[6] U. Füssel, J. Kalich, W. Siebert, Manufacturing of pre holes by cutting for Clinching processes and riveting functional elements at high strength steels,, P896, Düsseldorf 2014, Düsseldorf: Forschungsvereinigung Stahlanwendung e.V., (2014).

Google Scholar

[7] Mucha, J.: The analysis of lock forming mechanism in the clinching joint, Materials and Design, 2011,.

Google Scholar

[8] Carboni, M.; Beretta, S.; Monno, M.: Fatigue Behaviour of Tensile-Shear Loaded Clinched Joints, Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Vol. 73 (2006), S. 178-190.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.04.004

Google Scholar

[9] Su, Z.-M.; Lin, P.-C.; Lai, W.-J.; Pan, J.: Fatigue analyses of self-piercing rivets and clinch joints in lap-shear specimens of aluminum sheets, In: J. of Fatigue 72 (2015), S. 53–65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.022

Google Scholar

[10] Mori, K.; Abe, Y.; Kato, T.: Mechanism of superiority of fatigue strength for aluminium alloy sheets joined by mechanical clinching and self-pierce riveting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology n. 9 (2012), S. 1900–1905,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.04.017

Google Scholar