Sucrose and Lignosulfonate Acid: Which One is More Effective as a Concrete Setting Retarder?

Abstract:

The goal of this study is to experimentally evaluate the performance of sucrose and lignosulfonate acid as a concrete retarder. The initial and final setting times of concrete are obtained for various dosages of those admixtures. Besides, the impact of those retarders to the compressive strength of concrete is also explored. A total of 13 (thirteen) mix samples are made, in a laboratory, by adding various dosages of those admixtures into the reference mixtures. Those samples are tested using a concrete mortar penetrometer and a compression-testing machine to obtain their setting times and compressive strengths. Sucrose addition with a dosage of 0.01%, 0.014%, and 0.019% (by weight of cement) increases the initial setting time by 102.67%, 117.54%, and 138.89% and extends the final setting time by 57.70%, 72.83%, and 99.47%. The addition of liquid lignosulfonate acid by 0.6% (by weight of cement) causes the initial setting time to grow by 68.77% from 4.46 to 7.52 hours. Similarly, the final setting time is prolonged by 51.65% from 7.27 to 11.02 hours. This study confirms that sucrose is more effective than lignosulfonate acid in term of retarding concrete setting. However, careful attention is needed when applying sucrose as a set retarder because applying larger than a critical dosage results in an adverse effect. Sucrose is also an effective strength reducer for concrete. The 28-day strength reduces by 10 to 25% due to adding sucrose as much as 0.019% (by weight of cement).

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 884)
• Pages: 413-422
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.884.413
• Online since: May 2021
• Authors: Tommy Ekamitra Sutarto*, Tamrin Tamrin
• Keywords: Compressive Strength, Concrete Setting Time, Liqnosulfonate, Penetration Resistance, Sucrose, Sugar

References

[1] P-C. Aïtcin. Retarders. In: P-C Aïtcin, R.J. Flatt, editors. Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Elsevier, 2016, pp.395-404.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100693-1.00018-7

[2] C. Ishee and S. Surana. Hot weather concreting. In: Mindess, S., editor, Developments in the Formulation and Reinforcement of Concrete, Elsevier, 2019, pp.131-150.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102616-8.00006-x

[3] A.Schackow, C. Effting, I.R. Gomes, I.Z., Patruni, F. Vicenzi and F. Kramel. Temperature variation in concrete samples due to cement hydration. Applied Thermal Engineering 103 (2016), 1362–1369.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.048

[4] I. Chu, J.K. Kim, Y. Lee, M.N. Amin and B.S. Jang. Application of a thermal stress device for the prediction of stresses due to hydration heat in mass concrete structure, Constr. Build. Mater. 45 (2013), 192–198.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.056

[5] X. Zou, A. Chao, Y. Tian, N. Wu, H. Zhang, T.Y. Yu and X. Wang. An experimental study on the concrete hydration process using Fabry–Perot fiber optic temperature sensors, Measurement 45 (2012), 1077–1082.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.034

[6] American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM). Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete: C494/C494M-05. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2005).

[7] B.J. Smith, L.R. Roberts, G.P. Funkhouser, V. Gupta and B.F. Chmelka. 2012. Reactions and surface interactions of saccharides in cement slurries. Langmuir 28 (40), 14202-14217.

DOI: 10.1021/la3015157

[8] D. Marchon and R.J. Flatt. Impact of chemical admixtures on cement hydration. In: Aïtcin, P.-C., Flatt, R.J., editors. Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Elsevier, 2016, pp.279-304.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100693-1.00012-6

[9] D. Marchon, S. Mantellato, A.B. Eberhardt and R.J. Flatt. Adsorption of chemical admixtures. In: Aïtcin, P.-C., Flatt, R.J. editors. Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Elsevier, 2016, pp.219-256.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100693-1.00010-2

[10] V.K. Peterson and M.C.G. Juenger. Time-resolved quasielastic neutron scattering study of the hydration of tricalcium silicate: effects of CaCl2 and sucrose, Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2006, 385–386, 222–224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2006.05.194

[11] V.K. Peterson and M.C.G. Juenger. Hydration of tricalcium silicate: effects of CaCl2 and sucrose on reaction kinetics and product formation, Chem. Mater. 18 (2006), 5798–5804.

DOI: 10.1021/cm061724y

[12] American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM). Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates: C136/ C136M-19, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2019).

[13] American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM). Standard specification for concrete aggregates: C33 / C33M-16e1, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016).

[14] Sika Indonesia. Product data sheet Plastocrete® RT6 Plus. Cileungsi, Bogor, Indonesia, (2016).

[15] American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Plain Concrete and Commentary: ACI 318.1R-89 (revised 1992), American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, (1992).

DOI: 10.14359/2769

[16] American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 211. Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete: ACI 211.1-91 (reapproved 2002), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, (2002).

DOI: 10.14359/10987

[17] American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM). Standard test method for time of setting of concrete mixtures by penetration resistance: ASTM C403 / C403M-16, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016).

[18] American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens: C39-86, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2002).

[19] Y. Xu, X. Zhang, B. Ma and X. Liao. Effects of Temperature on the Performance of Sucrose in Cement Hydration. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 23 (2011), 1124-1127.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000264

[20] S. Ahmad, A. Lawan, M. Al-Osta. Effect of sugar dosage on setting time, microstructure and strength of Type I and Type V Portland cements. Case Studies in Construction Materials 13 (2020), e00364.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00364

[21] D. Marchon and R.J. Flaat. Impact of chemical admixtures on cement hydration. In: P-C Aïtcin, R.J. Flatt, editors. Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures. Elsevier, 2016, pp.279-304.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100693-1.00012-6

[22] M. Bishop and A.R. Barron. Cement hydration inhibition with Sucrose, Tartaric Acid, and Lignosulfonate: Analytical and Spectroscopic Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006 45 (2016), 7042-7049.

DOI: 10.1021/ie060806t

[23] H.S. Arel. The effect of lignosulfonates on concretes produced with cements of variable fineness and calcium aluminate content. Constr. Build. Mater. 131 (2017), 347-360.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.089

[24] M. Pérez-Nicolás, A. Duran, I. Navarro-Blasco, J.M. Fernández, R. Sirera, J.J. Alvarez. Study on the effectiveness of PNS and LS superplasticizers in air limebased mortars, Cem. Concr. Res. 82 (2016), 11–22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.12.006

[25] I.B. Topçu and O. Atesin. Effect of high dosage lignosulphonate and naphthalene sulphonate based plasticizer usage on micro concrete properties, Constr. Build. Mater. 120 (2016), 189-197.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.112