Influence of Part Orientation on the Surface Roughness in the Process of Fused Deposition Modeling

Article Preview

Abstract:

The article focused on the influence of part orientation on the surface roughness of cuboid parts during the process of fabricating by FDM technology. The components, in this case, is simple cuboid part with the dimensions 15 mm x 15mm x 30 mm. A geometrical model is defined that considers the shape of the material filaments after deposition, to define a theoretical roughness profile, for a certain print orientation angle. Five different print orientations in the X-axis of the cuboid part were set: 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. According to previous research in the field of FDM technology by the author, the internal structure (infill) was set at the value of 70%. The method of 3D printing was the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and the material used in this research was thermoplastic ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene). For each setting, there were five specimens (twenty five prints in total). Prints were fabricated on a Zortrax M200 3D printer. After the 3D printing, the surface “A” was investigated by portable surface roughness tester Mitutoyo SJ-210. Surface roughness in the article is shown in the form of graphs (Fig.7). Results show increase in part roughness with increasing degree of part orientation. When the direction of applied layers on the measured surface was horizontal, significant improvement in surface roughness was observed. Findings in this paper can be taken into consideration when designing parts, as they can contribute in achieving lower surface roughness values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

29-37

Citation:

Online since:

August 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chua, C. K., Leong, K. F., & Lim, C. S. (2003). Rapid prototyping: Principles and applications. (NetLibrary.) Singapore: World Scientific.

Google Scholar

[2] Buj-Corral I., Domínguez-Fernández A., & Durán-Llucià R. (January 01, 2019). Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes. Materials, 12, 23.).

DOI: 10.3390/ma12233834

Google Scholar

[3] Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (January 01, 2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites.part B, Engineering, 143, 172-196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

Google Scholar

[4] Yasa, E., Poyraz, O., Solakoglu, E. U., Akbulut, G., & Oren, S. (January 01, 2016). A Study on the Stair Stepping Effect in Direct Metal Laser Sintering of a Nickel-based Superalloy. Procedia Cirp, 45, 175-178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.068

Google Scholar

[5] Ayrilmis, N. (October 01, 2018). Effect of layer thickness on surface properties of 3D printed materials produced from wood flour/PLA filament. Polymer Testing, 71, 163-166.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.009

Google Scholar

[6] Hartcher-O'Brien, J., Evers, J., & Tempelman, E. (June 01, 2019). Surface roughness of 3D printed materials: Comparing physical measurements and human perception. Materials Today Communications, 19, 300-305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.008

Google Scholar

[7] Nagendra, J., Srinath, M. K., Sujeeth, S., Naresh, K. S., & Ganesha, P. M. S. (January 01, 2020). Optimization of process parameters and evaluation of surface roughness for 3D printed nylon-aramid composite. Materials Today: Proceedings.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.609

Google Scholar

[8] Chaudhari, M., Jogi, B. F., & Pawade, R. S. (January 01, 2018). Comparative Study of Part Characteristics Built Using Additive Manufacturing (FDM). Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 73-78.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.010

Google Scholar

[9] Wankhede, V., Jagetiya, D., Joshi, A., & Chaudhari, R. (January 01, 2020). Experimental investigation of FDM process parameters using Taguchi analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27, 2117-2120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.078

Google Scholar

[10] Khan, M. S., & Mishra, S. B. (January 01, 2020). Minimizing surface roughness of ABS-FDM build parts: An experimental approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 26, 1557-1566.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.320

Google Scholar

[11] Milde J., & Morovič L. (January 01, 2016). The Influence of Internal Structures in Fused Deposition Modeling Method on Dimensional Accuracy of Components. Research Papers. Faculty of Materials Science and Technology. Slovak University of Technology in Trnava, 24, 38, 73-80.

DOI: 10.1515/rput-2016-0041

Google Scholar

[12] Morovic, L., & Milde, J. (January 01, 2017). Influence of part orientation on geometrical and dimensional accuracy in FDM method. Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 15, 1, 24-28.

Google Scholar

[13] Milde, J., & Jurina, F. (January 01, 2019). Comparison of selected thermoplastic materials in the fused deposition modeling process and their influence on the dimensional accuracy of an orthodontic upper teeth model. 952.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.952.143

Google Scholar

[14] Milde, J., Hrusecky, R., Zaujec, R., Morovic, L., & Gorog, A. (January 01, 2017). Research of ABS and PLA Materials in the Process of Fused Deposition Modeling Method. 812-820.

DOI: 10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.114

Google Scholar

[15] Pandey, P. M., Thrimurthulu, K., & Reddy, N. V. (January 01, 2004). Optimal part deposition orientation in FDM by using a multicriteria genetic algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 42, 19, 4069-4089.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540410001708470

Google Scholar

[16] Ahn, D., Kweon, J.-H., Kwon, S., Song, J., & Lee, S. (August 01, 2009). Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 5593-5600.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.016

Google Scholar

[17] Olivera, S., Muralidhara, H. B., Venkatesh, K., Gopalakrishna, K., & Vivek, C. S. (April 01, 2016). Plating on acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) plastic: a review. Journal of Materials Science : Full Set - Includes `journal of Materials Science Letters', 51, 8, 3657-3674.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-015-9668-7

Google Scholar

[18] Khoo, Z. X., Teoh, J. E. M., Liu, Y., Chua, C. K., An, J., Leong, K. F., Yeong, W. Y., ... Yang, S. (July 03, 2015). 3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 10, 3, 103-122.

DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2015.1097054

Google Scholar