Fracture Behavior of the Hot Rolled Strip’s Surface Scale Layer from Different Impacts Angles

Abstract:

In order to improve the energy efficiency of shot blasting impact descaling, a three-dimensional finite element impact descaling model was established. Based on the finite element model, the cracking behavior of the scale layer on hot rolled strip from different impacts angles was simulated. The results of finite element calculation and theoretical analysis show that: (1)Under the premise of constant velocity, the descaling area increases with the increase of impact angle, but the increasing rate tends to be moderate. (2)The depth of the impact tunnel and the residual compressive stress surface (-200 MPa) increase as the impact angle goes bigger. The ideal range of impact angle for shot blasting descaling should be 60°-75°.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 905)
• Pages: 67-72
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.905.67
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Shang Wang*, Rui Can Hao, Hua Gang Liu, Xiao Chen Wang, Quan Yang
• Keywords: Descaling, Hot Rolled Strip, Scale Layer

References

[1] Gleeson B, Hadavi S M M, Young D J. Isothermal transformation behavior of thermally-grown wüstite[J]. Materials at High Temperatures, 2014, 17(2):311-318.

DOI: 10.1179/mht.2000.17.2.020

[2] Schwerdtfeger K, Shunxin Z. A contribution to scale growth during hot rolling of steel[J]. Steel research international, 2003, 74(9): 538.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.200300231

[3] Jun D H, Jun W Y. Factors influencing pickling quality and speed of oxide scale on hot rolled strip[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 33(3): 83-85.

[4] Khoo B C , Xu D , Yuen W Y D, et al. A computer analysis of turbulent flow of acid in the pickling of steel strips [C]// Recent Advances in Computational Science and Engineering. The International Conference on Scientific and Engineering Computation (IC-SEC), (2002).

DOI: 10.1142/9781860949524_0039

[5] Melster S, Pargmann A. Stretch bending levelers in pickling lines[J]. Iron Steel Engineer, 1995, 72(2): 37-41.

[6] Voges K C, Mueth A R. Method of producing rust inhibitive sheet metal through scale removal with a slurry blasting descaling cell: US, US8128460[P]. (2012).

[7] Chaudhuri S K, Rolls R. Fracture mechanisms in oxide scale on iron during substrate deformation[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1977, 12(11): 2303.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00552252

[8] Evans H E. Cracking and spalling of protective oxide layers[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1989, 120: 139.

DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90731-4

[9] Robertson J, Manning M I. Limits to adherence of oxide scales[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 1990, 6(1): 81.

[10] Nagl M M, Evans W T. The mechanical failure of oxide scales under tensile or compressive load[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1993, 28(23): 6247.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01352181

[11] Zhi G, Bu Y. Research on the wet shot blasting technology of strip steel surface topography and finite element simulation[C]// International Conference on Materials, Environmental and Biological Engineering. (2015).

DOI: 10.2991/mebe-15.2015.137

[12] Yujun R, Jun G G, Jun L. Mechanism analysis about breakdown and feed of slurry abrasive in wet blasting. [J]. Metallurgical Equipment, 2014, 2: 013.

[13] Shang W, Xiaochen W, Quan Y, et al. Destructive behavior of iron oxide in projectile impact[C]// Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, (2017).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/282/1/012011