Correlation of Humidity and Mechanical Properties of Different Grades of RT-PMMA

Article Preview

Abstract:

The implementation of glass in various industries may cause some problems due to its brittleness characteristic. Its usage in the transportation sector has led to death and serious injuries to drivers and passengers in vehicles. It shows that the manufacturing process of the materials used requires an improvement in terms of brittleness to provide better protection to the consumer. Therefore, rubber toughened PMMA (RT-PMMA) was introduced as the rubber has the ability to increase the ductility of PMMA. PMMA and two different grades of RT-PMMA namely RT-PMMA65 and RT-PMMA100 were taken into consideration to investigate the effect of different rubber contents on the ductility of PMMA. Other than strain rate and temperature, humidity is also one of the factors that affect the ductile properties of PMMA. In this study, tensile tests at different humidity levels (11% and 98%) will be carried out by immersing the specimens in two different solutions which are lithium chloride (LiCl) and potassium sulfate (K2SO4) beforehand. The output from the experimental works proved that the tensile properties of RT-PMMA are affected by the presence of humidity for all three grades of PMMA under consideration. It is also proved that RT-PMMA100 is more ductile compared to RT-PMMA65 on the tensile test.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

105-109

Citation:

Online since:

January 2022

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Wang, T. Duo, X. Xu, Z. Xiao, A. Xu, R. Liu, C. Jiang, J. Lu, Eco-Friendly High-Performance Poly(methyl methacrylate) Film Reinforced with Methylcellulose, ACS Omega. 5 (2020) 24256–24261.

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02249

Google Scholar

[2] P. Spasojevic, M. Zrilic, V. Panic, D. Stamenkovic, S. Seslija, S. Velickovic, The Mechanical Properties of a Poly(methyl methacrylate) Denture Base Material Modified with Dimethyl Itaconate and Di-n-butyl Itaconate, Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015 (2015).

DOI: 10.1155/2015/561012

Google Scholar

[3] K. Afaf, S. Boualem, K. Khacem, B. Mohamed, Experimental analysis of the physical degradation of polymers – the case of polymethyl methacrylate, Frat. Ed Integrita Strutt. 14 (2020) 66–80.

DOI: 10.3221/igf-esis.53.06

Google Scholar

[4] R. Bagheri, R.A. Pearson, Role of particle cavitation in rubber-toughened epoxies: 1. Microvoid toughening, Polymer (Guildf). 37 (1996) 4529–4538.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-9

Google Scholar

[5] L. Lalande, C.J.G. Plummer, J.A.E. Månson, P. Gérard, The influence of matrix modification on fracture mechanisms in rubber toughened polymethylmethacrylate, Polymer (Guildf). 47 (2006) 2389–2401.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.016

Google Scholar

[6] C.J.G. Plummer, P. Béguelin, H.H. Kausch, Microdeformation in core-shell particle modified polymethylmethacrylates, Colloids and Surfaces. 153 (1999) 551–566.

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00477-4

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Kaiser, Advancements in the Split Hopkinson Bar Test, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg Virginia, (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Jia, V.A. Kagan, Mechanical Performance of Polyamides with Influence of Moisture and Temperature – Accurate Evaluation and Better Understanding, Plast. Fail. Anal. Prev. (2001) 95–104.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-188420792-1.50014-7

Google Scholar

[9] C. Ishiyama, Y. Higo, Effects of humidity on Young's modulus in poly(methyl methacrylate), J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 40 (2002) 460–465.

DOI: 10.1002/polb.10107

Google Scholar

[10] A.M.S. Hamouda, The influence of humidity on the deformation and fracture behaviour of PMMA, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 124 (2002) 238–243.

Google Scholar

[11] N.M. Jali, P. Longere, Experimental investigation of the dynamic fracture of a class of RT-PMMAs under impact loading, Int. J. Fract. 225 (2020) 219–237.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-020-00475-x

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http://www.jstor.org/stable/1931961.

Google Scholar