Interfacial Reaction between SAC3807 Lead-Free Solders and Different Copper Substrate via Reflow Soldering Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The different composition material of copper substrate significantly affects the intermetallic compound (IMC) formation and the solder joints durability. This study was conducted on the interfacial reaction between lead-free solder and the different copper substrates via reflow soldering. The selected substrate is copper (Cu) and copper-beryllium (Cu-Be). The lead-free solder involved is Sn-3.8Ag-0.7Cu (SAC3807) solder ball with a diameter of 700 μm. All the samples were subjected to the isothermal aging process. The material characterization and analysis on the IMC formation were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical microscope (OM), and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). After the reflow process, the result revealed that Cu3Sn, Cu6Sn5 IMC layer formed at SAC3870/Cu and SAC3870/Cu-Be interface. The changes to a rod-like shape Cu6Sn5 and irregular needle-shaped Cu3Sn4 occur after the aging treatment on SAC3870/ Cu. Meanwhile, the IMC layer for SAC3870/Cu-Be shows a rod-like shape transformed into a blocky-like shape Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn4 diamond-shape. This result indicates that Ag3Sn nanosized was formed on the intermetallic surface during the aging process for both SAC3807/Cu and SAC3807/Cu-Be. The Ag3Sn nanosized element at SAC3807/Cu-Be is many compared to SAC3807/Cu. In addition, IMC thickness for SAC3807/Cu-Be shows a thicker layer than SAC3807/Cu. Lastly, in this research, the element of Be in SAC3807/Cu-Be cannot be defined because the beryllium element is not easily detected as the percentage was very low.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

278-283

Citation:

Online since:

January 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. S. Chang and Y. W. Yen, (2018): Investigation of the interfacial reactions and mechanical strength in the Sn-Ag-Cu (SAC)/Cu-Be alloy (Alloy 25) couple. In 2018 International Conference on Electronics Packaging and iMAPS All Asia Conference (ICEP-IAAC) (pp.97-101). IEEE.

DOI: 10.23919/icep.2018.8374679

Google Scholar

[2] C. S. Lau, C. Y. Khor, D. Soares, J. C. Teixeira and M. Z. Abdullah, (2016): Thermo-mechanical challenges of reflowed lead-free solder joints in surface mount components: a review. Soldering & Surface Mount Technology.

DOI: 10.1108/ssmt-10-2015-0032

Google Scholar

[3] B. S. Lee, Y. H. Ko, J. H. Bang, C. W. Lee, S. Yoo, J. K. Kim and J. W. Yoon, (2017): Interfacial reactions and mechanical strength of Sn-3.0 Ag-0.5 Cu/Ni/Cu and Au-20Sn/Ni/Cu solder joints for power electronics applications. Microelectronics Reliability, 71, 119-125.

DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.03.011

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Yin, M. Lin, Q. Li and Z. Wu, (2020): Effect of doping Ni nanoparticles on microstructure evolution and shear behavior of Sn–3.0 Ag–0.5 Cu (SAC305)/Cu–2.0 Be solder joints during reflowing. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 31(6), 4905-4914.

DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-03054-x

Google Scholar

[5] N. Nagel, (2018): Beryllium and Copper-Beryllium Alloys. ChemBioEng Reviews, 5(1), 30–33.

DOI: 10.1002/cben.201700016

Google Scholar

[6] Y. D. Zhu, M. F. Yan, Y. X. Zhang and C. S. Zhang, (2018): Surface modification of C17200 copper-beryllium alloy by plasma nitriding of Cu-Ti gradient film. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 27(3), 961-969.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-018-3190-4

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Yin, M. Lin, Y. Huang, Y. Chen, Q. Li and Z. W, (2020): Effect of Doped Nano-Ni on Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Behavior of Sn-3.0 Ag-0.5 Cu (SAC305)/Cu-2.0 Be Solder Joint during Isothermal Aging. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 29, 3315-3323.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-020-04838-2

Google Scholar

[8] K. Esmati, H. Omidvar, J., Jelokhani and M. Naderi, (2014): Study on the microstructure and mechanical properties of diffusion brazing joint of C17200 Copper Beryllium alloy. Materials & Design, 53, 766-773.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.080

Google Scholar

[9] W. J. Wolfgong, (2016): Chemical analysis techniques for failure analysis: Part 1, common instrumental methods. In Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis with Case Studies from the Aerospace and Automotive Industries.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800950-5.00015-6

Google Scholar

[10] J. Al Ahmar, E. Wiss and & S. Wiese, (2017): Fracture probability of MLCC in dependence of solder fillet height. In 2017 18th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (Eurosime) (pp.1-4). IEEE.

DOI: 10.1109/eurosime.2017.7926256

Google Scholar

[11] D. Ozkan and C. Turkuz, (2020): Chromium nitride-coated copper beryllium as a cam tappet material candidate. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 0(0), 1–17.

DOI: 10.1177/0954406220927055

Google Scholar

[12] J. Gong, C. Liu, P. P. Conway and V. V. Silberschmidt, (2008): Evolution of CuSn intermetallics between molten SnAgCu solder and Cu substrate. Acta Materialia, 56(16), 4291–4297.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.063

Google Scholar

[13] X. Liu, M. Huang, Y. Zhao, C. M. L. Wu and L. Wang, (2010): The adsorption of Ag3Sn nano-particles on Cu-Sn intermetallic compounds of Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu/Cu during soldering. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 492(1–2), 433–438.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.131

Google Scholar