Influence of Composition and Structure on Wear Resistance of Deposited Metal

Aleksandr Nazarko; Roman Plomodyalo

doi:10.4028/p-g225xg

Paper Titles

Application of the Method for Optical Measuring the Neck Profile to Determine the Hardening Curve of Aluminum from the Results of the Tensile Test
p.1032

Relation of the Mayer Index to the Characteristics of the Power Law of Metal Hardening
p.1040

Determination of the Tensile Strain by Indenting the Sphere
p.1049

Structural Transformations at the Interface of Explosively Welded Al and Ti: Experimental Research and Numerical Simulation
p.1056

Influence of Composition and Structure on Wear Resistance of Deposited Metal
p.1063

Influence of Titanium and Nitrogen on Phase Composition and Properties of Coatings Obtained by Surfacing with Cast Rods of PNL-04Kh27N7M3D2T Type
p.1069

Production of Nanostructured Boron Carbide Ceramics for Industrial Applications
p.1075

Application of Nano-Chromium Oxide for Production of Boron Carbide Ceramics
p.1081

The Structure and Characteristics of Wear-Resistant Coatings, Obtained by Supersonic Plasma Spraying
p.1087

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 910Influence of Composition and Structure on Wear...

Influence of Composition and Structure on Wear Resistance of Deposited Metal

Abstract:

Comparison of the data on resistance of alloys against abrasive wear made it possible to establish that alloys with a predominantly austenitic or austenitic-martensite matrix and eutectic component based on alloyed chromium carbide Cr₇C₃ [5] or Cr₂₃C₆ have the highest wear resistance, while microhardness of austenite and martensite should be higher than 5000 N/mm². In alloys with high wear resistance, there is also no significant difference in microhardness of eutectic and primary crystals of γ-iron, which is probably one of the indicators of adhesion strength of carbides and solid solution. In the case of formation of a pearlite component, wear resistance drops sharply.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 910)

Pages:

1063-1068

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-g225xg

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2022

Authors:

Aleksandr Nazarko*, Roman Plomodyalo

Keywords:

Abrasion Resistance, Argon-Arc Surfacing, Carbides, Cast Rod, Hardness, Structure

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Fundamentals of alloying deposited metal. Livshits L.S., Grinberg N.A., Kurkumelli E.G. Mechanical Engineering, 1969, 188 p.

Google Scholar

[2] Separate and complex methods of alloying the deposited metal with titanium carbide during arc wear-resistant surfacing. Nazarko A.S., Plomodyalo R.L. In the collection: Engineering and technology of mechanical engineering, materials of the VII International Scientific and Technical Conference. 2018, pp.53-57.

Google Scholar

[3] Goldschmidt H. J. Interventional alloys. - M.: Mir, 1971. - Issue. 2.- 463 p.

Google Scholar

[4] Liu, Y. F., Han, J. M., Li, R. H., Li, W. J., Xu, X. Y., Wang, J. H., and Yang, S. Z. 2006. Microstructure and dry-sliding wear resistance of PTA clad (Cr, Fe)7C3/γ-Fe ceramal composite coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252: 7539-7544.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.09.008

Google Scholar

[5] Coronado, J. J. 2011. Effect of (Fe, Cr)7C3 carbide orientation on abrasion wear resistance and fracture toughness. Wear 270: 287-293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.10.070

Google Scholar