Debonding of Vegetal FRCM from Concrete Beams Subjected to Bending Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

The increasing need of society to develop more sustainable and renewable materials has made vegetal fibers an interesting potential substitute for synthetic fibers in strengthening systems, due to their considerable strength and deformation capacity. This paper aims to increase the knowledge on how the materials interact between them in vegetal FRCM composites to strengthen concrete structures. To do it, two fibers were selected: cotton (CO), due to its good deformation capacity, and hemp (HE), due to its high strength. A low-viscosity and high adherence epoxy resin was used to coat the yarns to protect them from the alkali environment of the cementitious matrix. To study the FRCM-substrate interaction, an adaptation of the test methodology described in ISO 10080:2005 was developed and performed. Three different lengths (30, 40, and 50 cm) were used to obtain the optimal bonding length for hemp case. A single case (50 cm) for cotton was tested to compare its behaviour against hemp. In the FRCM-substrate interaction, it is noticed that hemp-FRCM shows complete bonding as all except one specimen failed by mesh failure. In the case of cotton-FRCM, its deformation capacity (at least 4 times hemp-FRCM) made all specimens deform until the geometric end of the testing set up without the mesh breakage, bearing a lower load but keeping it constant through fiber-matrix friction. In terms of load, hemp-FRCM reached the highest load, 10% higher than cotton-FRCM’s peak load. To conclude, the testing method for assessing steel reinforcement bonding in reinforced concrete was proved to be satisfactory at assessing FRCM-concrete interaction, being able to transmit the load from the substrate to the composite without the slippage of the vegetal-FRCM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

449-456

Citation:

Online since:

April 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. Zou, P. Feng, Y. Bao, J. Wang, and H. Xin, Experimental and analytical studies on shear behaviors of FRP-concrete composite sections,, Eng. Struct., vol. 215, p.110649, Jul. 2020,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110649

Google Scholar

[2] D. Baggio, K. Soudki, and M. Noël, Strengthening of shear critical RC beams with various FRP systems,, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 66, no. September 2014, p.634–644, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.097

Google Scholar

[3] M. Tariq and J. P. Newhook, Shear testing of FRP reinforced concrete without transverse reinforcement,, Proceedings, Annu. Conf. - Can. Soc. Civ. Eng., vol. 2003, no. January 2003, p.1330–1339, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] P. J. Heffernan and M. A. Erki, Fatigue behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with prestressed fiber reinforced polymer,, Compos. Constr., vol. 8, no. 1, p.132–140, 2004,.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2004)8:2(132)

Google Scholar

[5] H. R. Hamilton III and C. W. Dolan, Flexural Capacity of Glass FRP Strengthened Concrete Masonry Walls,, J. Compos. Constr., vol. 5, no. 3, p.170–178, (2001).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2001)5:3(170)

Google Scholar

[6] S. M. Raoof, L. N. Koutas, and D. A. Bournas, Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams,, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 151, p.279–291, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.023

Google Scholar

[7] S. M. Raoof and D. A. Bournas, TRM versus FRP in flexural strengthening of RC beams: Behaviour at high temperatures,, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 154, p.424–437, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.195

Google Scholar

[8] Z. C. Tetta, L. N. Koutas, and D. A. Bournas, Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) in shear strengthening of concrete beams,, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 77, p.338–348, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.055

Google Scholar

[9] R. Ortlepp, U. Hampel, and M. Curbach, A new approach for evaluating bond capacity of TRC strengthening,, Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 28, no. 7, p.589–597, 2006,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.05.003

Google Scholar

[10] L. Ombres, Analysis of the bond between Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Mortar ( FRCM ) strengthening systems and concrete,, Compos. PART B, vol. 69, p.418–426, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.027

Google Scholar

[11] L. Ombres, Debonding analysis of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with fibre reinforced cementitious mortar,, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 81, p.94–109, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.012

Google Scholar

[12] J. Donnini, G. Lancioni, and V. Corinaldesi, Failure modes in FRCM systems with dry and pre-impregnated carbon yarns: Experiments and modeling,, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 140, no. July 2017, p.57–67, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.024

Google Scholar

[13] K. L. Pickering, M. G. A. Efendy, and T. M. Le, A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance,, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 83, p.98–112, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038

Google Scholar

[14] P. Wambua, J. Ivens, and I. Verpoest, Natural fibres: Can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?,, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 63, no. 9, p.1259–1264, 2003,.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00096-4

Google Scholar

[15] O. A. Cevallos and R. S. Olivito, Effects of fabric parameters on the tensile behaviour of sustainable cementitious composites,, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 69, p.256–266, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.004

Google Scholar

[16] R. S. Olivito, R. Codispoti, and O. A. Cevallos, Bond behavior of Flax-FRCM and PBO-FRCM composites applied on clay bricks: Experimental and theoretical study,, Compos. Struct., vol. 146, p.221–231, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.004

Google Scholar

[17] C. B. de Carvalho Bello, I. Boem, A. Cecchi, N. Gattesco, and D. V. Oliveira, Experimental tests for the characterization of sisal fiber reinforced cementitious matrix for strengthening masonry structures,, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 219, p.44–55, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.168

Google Scholar

[18] UNE-EN-10080:2005, Acero para el armado de hormigón. Acero soldable para armaduras de hormigón armado. Generalidades,, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0439-5689(14)70004-x

Google Scholar

[19] L. Mercedes, L. Gil, and E. Bernat-Maso, Mechanical performance of vegetal fabric reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites,, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 175, p.161–173, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.171

Google Scholar